This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Padhani, A R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Padhani, A R

MRI for assessing antivascular cancer treatments

Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK

Selective antiangiogenesis and vascular targeting drugs hold out the promise of improved efficacy and tolerability for anticancer treatments. Early phase 1 drug trials have shown good tolerability for antiangiogenesis agents with biological activity below the maximum tolerated dose. Advanced clinical trials have demonstrated that morphological assessments of tumour response are of limited value in gauging the efficacy of treatment. MRI is a versatile technique which is sensitive to contrast mechanisms that can be affected by antivascular treatments; this use for MRI has been validated in xenografts and humans. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), which demonstrates tissue perfusion and permeability, is being used clinically as a pharmacodynamic indicator of biological activity for antivascular cancer drugs. Early data show that DCE-MRI studies can define the biologically active dose and predict the efficacy of treatment on the basis of changes observed. MRI with macromolecular contrast media (MMCM) depicts microvessel permeability and fractional plasma volume. Xenograft studies with MMCM have shown great promise for evaluating antivascular treatments but this has not been used clinically. Intrinsic susceptibility-weighted MRI, which is sensitive to blood oxygenation and flow, is emerging as a technique that may be able to monitor vascular targeting therapies.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Zhao, E. Richer, P. P. Antich, and R. P. Mason Antivascular effects of combretastatin A4 phosphate in breast cancer xenograft assessed using dynamic bioluminescence imaging and confirmed by MRI FASEB J, July 1, 2008; 22(7): 2445 - 2451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Niermann, A. C. Fleischer, J. Huamani, T. E. Yankeelov, D. W. Kim, W. D. Wilson, and D. E. Hallahan Measuring Tumor Perfusion in Control and Treated Murine Tumors: Correlation of Microbubble Contrast-Enhanced Sonography to Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2007; 26(6): 749 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Golman, R. i. Zandt, M. Lerche, R. Pehrson, and J. H. Ardenkjaer-Larsen Metabolic Imaging by Hyperpolarized 13C Magnetic Resonance Imaging for In vivo Tumor Diagnosis. Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 66(22): 10855 - 10860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Semple, R. Staff, S. Heys, T. Redpath, A. Welch, T. Ahearn, A. Hutcheon, and F. Gilbert Baseline MRI delivery characteristics predict change in invasive ductal breast carcinoma PET metabolism as a result of primary chemotherapy administration Ann. Onc., September 1, 2006; 17(9): 1393 - 1398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Muruganandham, M. Lupu, J. P. Dyke, C. Matei, M. Linn, K. Packman, K. Kolinsky, B. Higgins, and J. A. Koutcher Preclinical evaluation of tumor microvascular response to a novel antiangiogenic/antitumor agent RO0281501 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at 1.5 T. Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2006; 5(8): 1950 - 1957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Goh, S. Halligan, J.-A. Hugill, and C. I. Bartram Quantitative assessment of tissue perfusion using MDCT: comparison of colorectal cancer and skeletal muscle measurement reproducibility. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 164 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R. Padhani, C. Hayes, L. Assersohn, T. Powles, A. Makris, J. Suckling, M. O. Leach, and J. E. Husband Prediction of Clinicopathologic Response of Breast Cancer to Primary Chemotherapy at Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging: Initial Clinical Results Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 361 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Yankeelov, K. J. Niermann, J. Huamani, D. W. Kim, C. C. Quarles, A. C. Fleischer, D. E. Hallahan, R. R. Price, and J. C. Gore Correlation Between Estimates of Tumor Perfusion From Microbubble Contrast-Enhanced Sonography and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2006; 25(4): 487 - 497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]