| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Full Paper |
Department of Radiology, St George's Hospital, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, UK
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of CO2 angiography with that of iodinated contrast angiography for vascular mapping prior to partial nephrectomy for presumed renal cell carcinoma. 13 consecutive patients were studied and all patients underwent selective renal angiography using both CO2 and iodinated contrast medium. Digitally subtracted images were acquired and compared. Seven male and six female patients, with a median age of 58 years (range 4674 years), were examined. On comparing images the main renal artery was visualized in all cases with both contrast agents. The segmental vessels were seen in 7 of 13 CO2 studies and 12 of 13 iodinated contrast studies. CO2 was also inferior in the depiction of tumour circulation, showing it in 4 of 13 cases compared with 9 of 13 cases using iodinated contrast. It therefore appears that CO2 angiography offers no diagnostic advantage and is also inferior to iodinated contrast angiography in the pre-operative vascular mapping of renal tumours.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |