BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poll, L W
Right arrow Articles by Weinreb, N J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poll, L W
Right arrow Articles by Weinreb, N J
British Journal of Radiology 75 (2002),A25-A36 © 2002 The British Institute of Radiology

Chapter 3

Response of Gaucher bone disease to enzyme replacement therapy

L W Poll, MD1, M Maas, MD2, M R Terk, MD3, M Roca-Espiau, MD4, B Bembi, MD5, G Ciana, MD5 and N J Weinreb, MD6

1 Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany, 2 Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3 Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, USA, 4 Department of Radiology, Musculoskeletal MRI Section, Miguel Servet Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain, 5 Burlo Garofolo Institute, Trieste, Italy and 6 University Gaucher Research Foundation Inc., University Gaucher Treatment Center, Tamarac, Florida, USA

Correspondence: Ludger W Poll, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstrasse 5, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. Tel. +49 211 81 17752; Fax +49 211 81 16145; email polll{at}uni-duesseldorf.de

In Gaucher disease, enzyme replacement therapy usually reduces liver and spleen volumes and improves haematological abnormalities within 1 year. In contrast, skeletal manifestations of Gaucher disease are thought to respond more slowly. For example, decreased bone marrow glycolipid infiltration and increased bone mineral density have been reported to take up to 3–4 years of treatment. In this report, we present recent studies using T1- and T2-weighted MRI and quantitative chemical shift imaging that demonstrate decreases in abnormal glucocerebroside infiltration and increases in normal fat content of bone marrow within the first year of treatment. There was no obvious relationship between age, gender, splenectomy status or genotype and the response of bone marrow to therapy. Although the dose of enzyme replacement therapy may be related to bone marrow response, no significant relationship was demonstrated in this report. Long-term enzyme replacement therapy induces continued degradation of Gaucher cell deposits, reconversion of fat marrow and increased bone mineral density. This treatment is also associated with improved or non-progressive bone symptoms and functional status in most adult patients, and it prevents the new occurrence of bone pain and bone crisis in nearly all patients. The development of more sensitive, quantitative imaging methods will help to evaluate disease severity better and to assess the response to therapy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. F. DeMayo, A. H. Haims, M. C. McRae, R. Yang, and P. K. Mistry
Correlation of MRI-Based Bone Marrow Burden Score with Genotype and Spleen Status in Gaucher's Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 115 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. L. Robertson, M. Maas, and J. Goldblatt
Semiquantitative Assessment of Skeletal Response to Enzyme Replacement Therapy for Gaucher's Disease Using the Bone Marrow Burden Score
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1521 - 1528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M Maas, L W Poll, and M R Terk
Imaging and quantifying skeletal involvement in Gaucher disease
Br. J. Radiol., May 24, 2002; 75(90001): A13 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2002 by the British Institute of Radiology.