BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fenner, J W
Right arrow Articles by West, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fenner, J W
Right arrow Articles by West, N
British Journal of Radiology 75 (2002),596-602 © 2002 The British Institute of Radiology

Full Paper

A practical demonstration of improved technique factors in paediatric fluoroscopy

J W Fenner, PhD1, G D Morrison, MSc1, J Kerry, MSc2 and N West, MSc3

1 Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, 2 Medical Physics Department, County Hospital, Greetwell Road, Lincoln LN2 5QY and 3 Radiotherapy Physics, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary NHS Trust, London Road, Derby DE1 2QY, UK

Dose incurred with fluoroscopic procedures accounts for a significant proportion of medically induced diagnostic exposure. Children are particularly vulnerable and it is therefore important to minimize exposure where practicable. A recent theoretical study has highlighted the potential for X-ray equipment to produce significant dose savings during paediatric fluoroscopy without incurring loss of diagnostic image quality. This is achieved by hardening the beam with additional copper (Cu) filtration (~0.2 mm Cu) and biasing exposure factors towards low tube potential, high tube current output. In practice, this method will have limited applicability because the high powered and programmable generator characteristics required are not commonly available in installations used for paediatric imaging. However, we describe a simple experiment in which our clinical equipment was modified to approximate desired low dose performance by altering the filtration and automatic exposure control characteristics of ordinary clinical equipment in the Sheffield Children's Hospital. This enabled us to obtain significant savings in dose. We performed a comparative study (normal dose vs low dose) using water phantoms to simulate patient attenuation in the age range 0–15 years. The Leeds N2 contrast sensitivity phantom was used to provide a measure of image quality. Dosimetric measurements recorded up to 40% reduction in dose rate with only marginal loss of image quality when 0.1–0.2 mm Cu filtration was used with the modified settings. This is a strong indication that significant dose reduction is achievable on routine clinical equipment without compromising image quality. Such simple and cost effective methods of dose reduction should be considered for wider implementation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
R S Livingstone, C G Koshy, and D V Raj
Evaluation of work practices and radiation dose during adult micturating cystourethrography examinations performed using a digital imaging system
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2004; 77(923): 927 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D G W Onnasch, A Schemm, and H-H Kramer
Optimization of radiographic parameters for paediatric cardiac angiography
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2004; 77(918): 479 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2002 by the British Institute of Radiology.