| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
We read with great interest the article entitled "CT findings of pulmonary artery dissection" by Neimatallah et al [1], highlighting the usefulness of CT in the diagnosis of this potentially fatal condition. I would, however, like to highlight a potential pitfall in using CT for the diagnosis of pulmonary artery dissection.
In retrospect, the pseudo-flap in the pulmonary artery represents motion artefact from aortic and cardiac pulsation. Such artefact has been described to mimic Stanford Type A dissections. It has been suggested that the presence of a superior vena cava (SVC) pseudo-flap is useful in distinguishing motion artefact from true aortic dissection [2]. Although no SVC pseudo-flap is seen in our case, an aortic root pseudo-flap (curved arrow in Figure 1
) is present and alludes to the presence of motion artefact. In addition, reconstructed coronal images cannot be used to confirm the presence of a true flap, as it is simply a different view of the same artefact-containing dataset [2].
|
|
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore 308433., E-mail: druei{at}yahoo.com
Received for publication September 5, 2008. Accepted for publication October 6, 2008.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Degano, G. Prevot, L. Tetu, O. Sitbon, G. Simonneau, and M. Humbert Fatal dissection of the pulmonary artery in pulmonary arterial hypertension Eur. Respir. Rev., September 1, 2009; 18(113): 181 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |