BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2007) 80, 1024
© 2007 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/14544082

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dawson, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dawson, P

Correspondence

Liver perfusion measurements

The Editor — Sir,

I read with interest the article by Murase, Miyazaki, and Yang (An efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters in a dual-input single-compartment model. Brit J Radiol 2007;80:371–5). The authors highlight the importance of separating the two components of the dual blood supply to the liver because "contributions from each are altered in many diseases". It is a pity that they do not cite one of the most elegant and successful approaches to this problem developed for use in functional CT by my late colleague Martin Blomley (Blomley MJ, Coulden R, Dawson P, Kormano M, Donlan P, Bufkin C, et al. Liver perfusion studied with ultrafast CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995;19:424–33).

The approach, in brief, involves the following procedure: time-attenuation curves are plotted for both spleen and liver parenchyma. The peak up-slope gradient of the splenic curve is determined and the time at which peak splenic enhancement is achieved is noted. It is assumed (reasonably) that portal perfusion is negligible prior to this time. The peak up-slope of the liver curve in this pre-portal phase is found and used to calculate the hepatic arterial perfusion. Dividing this early peak liver gradient by the peak splenic gradient gives a measure of the ratio of hepatic to splenic (arterial) perfusion. The arterial component of the liver curve is then removed as follows. The (baseline-subtracted) splenic curve is multiplied by the ratio of hepatic to splenic perfusion already obtained, and the result is subtracted from the liver curve to obtain the portal venous contribution. The approach assumes only that the distribution of transit times through the spleen and liver, and also the arrival times of arterial blood in the spleen and liver, are similar.

Yours etc.,

P Dawson

Departments of Imaging, UCL Hospitals, University College London, Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK, E-mail: peter.dawson{at}uclh.nhs.uk

Received for publication September 13, 2007. Revision received September 28, 2007. Accepted for publication October 1, 2007.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dawson, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dawson, P


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS