British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, e184-e186
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/81338007
The ultrasound halo sign in angiolymphoid hyperplasia of the temporal artery
M W T Arnander, MRCS, MSc
1
N G Anderson, MBChB, FRANZCR
2 and
F Schönauer, MD
1
Departments of 1Plastic Surgery and 2Radiology, The Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Holtye Road, East Grinstead, West Sussex RH19 3DZ, UK
Correspondence: Magnus Arnander, 6 Stack House, Cundy Street, London SW1W 9JS, UK. E-mail: magnus1{at}hotmail.co.uk.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
An ultrasound halo sign surrounding the temporal artery is a well recognized feature associated with giant cell arteritis. We report a previously unreported case of this halo sign being present around the temporal artery due to angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia (ALHE) in a young female patient.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia (ALHE) is a vascular proliferative disease with an unknown aetiology. It is an uncommon cause of a forehead or temporal region nodule [1]. Typically, ALHE arises in the head and neck region of young women, especially around the ear, presenting as raised sometimes coloured nodules which are often itchy. It rarely regresses spontaneously, but there are no reports of metastatic spread [2].
ALHE is most often found in vessels of the subcutis or dermis, but can affect larger muscular arteries, such as the facial artery and the temporal artery, and rarer cases have also been reported on the hand and in the mouth [36].
Microscopic features include vessels lined by atypical endothelial cells, which are plump and epithelioid. There is a characteristic eosinophilic infiltration in the perivascular tissue, associated with lymphocytic infiltration. 20% of cases also have generalized eosinophilia, and occasionally raised serum IgE levels [3, 7].
Being uncommon, it is easily misdiagnosed; nodules have been mistaken for more common pathologies such as lipoma, sebaceous cyst, Dupuytrens disease or giant cell arteritis in some cases leading to unexpected severe haemorrhage at operation [5, 8, 9].
We present a case in which angiolymphoid hyperplasia mimicked giant cell arteritis on preoperative Doppler ultrasound due to the presence of a halo sign.
 |
Case report
|
|---|
A 31-year-old female patient presented to clinic with an 18 month history of a solitary painless but itchy nodule in her left temporal region. There had been no history of trauma, and it had not bruised or bled. She did not report migraines, jaw claudication, muscle cramps or visual symptoms.
On examination she was found to have a fixed, pulsatile mass in the left temporal region with no overlying skin changes. A vascular lesion was suspected and pre-operative Doppler ultrasound was performed. Routine haematology, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and biochemistry tests were all within normal reference ranges.
Pre-operative ultrasound scanning was performed using a 13 MHz linear transducer (Sonoline Antares; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The ultrasound study demonstrated circumferential but asymmetric thickening of the left superficial temporal artery and its branches, with wall thickening of between 1 mm and 2 mm. The changes were purely arterial and there was no abnormal flow pattern seen within the lumen. There was a halo effect seen around the affected vessels over a length of 20 mm. These ultrasound appearances were strongly suggestive of a diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (Figure 1
).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Ultrasound image of a branch of left superficial temporal artery showing marked asymmetric thickening of the vessel wall, producing a"halo" around the lumen. (a) With colour Doppler. (b) Same image without colour. Arrow indicates the outer table of skull.
|
|
Subsequent excision (Figure 2
) and histological analysis (Figure 3
) of the lesion revealed a diagnosis of angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia involving branches of the superficial temporal artery.

View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Central artery surrounded by florid lymphoid tissue. Haematoxylin and eosin, field width 3.4 mm.
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
As previously stated, the aetiology of ALHE is unknown. Some argue ALHE represents a reaction to previous microtrauma to vessels as there is an association with evidence of previous vessel damage such as arteriovenous shunting and vascular wall repair [7, 10]. Others propose ALHE is a benign vascular neoplasm [11] which has been shown to be associated with hyperoestrogenism [2, 12]. Even though ALHE has some similar features to Kimura's disease, it is considered a different entity [13].
A variety of treatments for the nodules have been attempted, most of which are based on small case numbers. Modalities have included cryosurgery [14], corticosteroids [15], lasers [16, 17], intralesional interferon injections [18] and Mohs micrographic surgery [19], but overall up to a third of cases are thought to recur. Complete surgical excision has been shown to have lower recurrence rates [20].
Diagnostic imaging of ALHE has included angiography, FDG PET scanning, CT and nuclear magnetic resonance scanning (MR), with Doppler ultrasound being mentioned in some reports [3, 5, 21, 22].
CT of ALHE usually shows an enhancing mass [3, 23]. Angiographic appearances demonstrate a thickened enhancing arterial wall or mass, often with fusiform dilatation which can lead to the misdiagnosis of aneurysm. This enhancement begins in the late arterial phase and becomes most intense during the capillary and venous phases [23]. At MR and PET scanning, the lesion has been described as being vascular [21]. Some of these imaging features are also seen in giant cell arteritis, which is characterized by a hypoechoic halo at ultrasound [24] and a thickened enhancing wall at MR [22].
The principal unusual finding in this case was the asymmetric ultrasound halo seen around the temporal artery affected by ALHE. In previous reports of a halo sign around the temporal artery, the diagnosis has almost always been that of giant cell arteritis. Rare reports have associated the halo effect with other diagnoses including polymyalgia rheumatica, infection, malignancy and osteoarthritis [25].
Published meta-analysis has shown that the halo sign is only predictive of giant cell arteritis if the pre-test probability of giant cell arteritis is moderate to high, based on clinical criteria including age (over 50 years) and ESR (raised). If the pre-test probability of giant cell arteritis is low, such as in this case, then the post-test probability of giant cell arteritis is approximately 3050% [26].
Ultrasound features of ALHE that have been previously reported include a vascular mass and low resistance arterial waveforms seen on Doppler [3, 27]. A halo sign at ultrasound has not previously been reported in AHLE. In giant cell arteritis it is thought that the halo sign is due to oedema rather than inflammatory infiltrate, as the halo is not always associated with an infiltrative process [24]. We are uncertain of the exact histological correlate of the halo in ALHE, but it is likely to be due to the perivascular infiltrate and, provided the lumen has not been completely obliterated, the authors feel that the halo is not an unexpected finding in view of the marked thickening of the arterial wall that is associated with ALHE.
We report this case to acquaint radiologists with this rare vascular lesion, and to encourage pre-operative ultrasound imaging of any prominent itchy skin nodule prior to excision, especially in the region of the head and neck.
Received for publication October 24, 2005.
Revision received January 6, 2006.
Accepted for publication January 25, 2006.
 |
References
|
|---|
- Wells GC, Whimster IW. Subcutaneous angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia. Br J Dermatol 1969;81:115.[Medline]
- Zarrin-Khameh N, Spoden JE, Tran RM. Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia associated with pregnancy. Arch Path Lab Medicine 2005;129:116871.
- Kimura Y, Tsutsumi T, Kuroishikawa Y, Kishimoto S. Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia arising from the facial artery. J Laryngol Otol 2003;117:5703.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Aurello P, Cicchini C, D'Angelo F, Di Gioia CR, D'Amati G. Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia: a rare artery lesion. Anticancer Res 2003;23:306972.[Medline]
- Krapohl BD, Machens HG, Reichert B, Mailander P. A rare vasoproliferative lesion: angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia of the hand. Br J Plast Surg 2003;56:16870.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Peters E, Altini M, Kola AH. Oral angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986;61:739.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Fetsch JF, Weiss SW. Observations concerning the pathogenesis of epithelioid hemangioma (angiolymphoid hyperplasia). Mod Pathol 1991;4:44955.
- Lie JT, Gordon LP, Titus JL. Juvenile temporal arteritis. Biopsy study of four cases. JAMA 1975;234:4969.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lim CB, Khanduja V, Aleong JA, Douek M. A bloody mess: scalp lump misidentified. J R Soc Med 2005;98:645.[Free Full Text]
- Olsen TG, Helwig EB. Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia: a clinicopathologic study of 116 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985;12:78196.[Medline]
- Rosai J, Gold J, Landy R. The histiocytoid hemangiomas. A unifying concept embracing several previously described entities of skin, soft tissue, large vessels, bone and heart. Hum Pathol 1979;10:48997.
- Moy RL, Luftman DB, Nguyen QH, Amenta JS. Estrogen receptors and the response to sex hormones in angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia. Arch Dermatol 1992;128:8258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Googe PB, Harris NL, Mihm MC Jr. Kimura's disease and angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia: two distinct histopathological entities. J Cutan Pathol 1987;14:26371.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Baler GR. Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia: a report of two cases. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1981;7:22934.[Medline]
- Calhoun KH, Newton RC, Sanchez RL. Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;114:14746.
- Lertzman BH, McMeekin T, Gaspari AA. Pulsed dye laser treatment for angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia lesions. Arch Dermatol 1997;133:9201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Fosko SW, Glaser DA, Rogers CJ. Eradication of angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia by copper vapor laser. Arch Dermatol 2001;137:8635.[Free Full Text]
- Rampini P, Semino M, Drago F, Rampini E. Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia: successful treatment with interferon alpha 2b. Dermatology 2001;202:343[CrossRef][Medline]
- Miller CJ, Ioffreda MD, Ammirati CT. Mohs micrographic surgery for angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia. Dermatol Surg 2004;30:116973.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Baum EW, Sams WM Jr, Monheit GD. Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia: the disease and comparison of treatment modalities. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1982;8:96670.[Medline]
- Nguyen BD. Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia: F-18 FDG PET and MR demonstration. Clin Nucl Med 2003;28:9967.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Bley TA, Wieben O, Uhl M, Thiel J, Schmidt D, Langer M. High-resolution MRI in giant cell arteritis: imaging of the wall of the superficial temporal artery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:2837.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Cornelius RS, Biddinger PW, Gluckman JL. Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia of the head and neck. Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:9168.[Abstract]
- Schmidt WA, Kraft HE, Vorpahl K, Volker L, Gromnica-Ihle EJ. Color duplex ultrasonography in the diagnosis of temporal arteritis. N Engl J Med 1997;337:133642.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Nesher G, Shemesh D, Mates M, Sonnenblick M, Abramowitz HB. The predictive value of the halo sign in colour Doppler ultrasonography of the temporal arteries for diagnosing giant cell arteritis. J Rheumatol 2002;29:12246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Karassa FB, Matsagas MI, Schmidt WA, Ioannidis JP. Meta-analysis: test performance of ultrasonography for giant-cell arteritis. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:35969.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Ahuja A, Ying M, Mok JS, Anil CM. Gray scale and power Doppler sonography in cases of Kimura disease. Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:5137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]