BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 57-59
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/55015850

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groves, A M
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, A K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Groves, A M
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, A K

Case report

False negative 16 detector multislice CT for scaphoid fracture

A M Groves, FRCR 1 H K Cheow, FRCR 2 K K Balan, FRCPI 2 H M Courtney, DCR 1 P W P Bearcroft, FRCR 1 and A K Dixon, FRCR 1

Departments of 1 Radiology and 2 Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital and the University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case report
 Discussion
 References
 
We discuss a case of a 19-year-old man with scaphoid trauma. We describe the imaging findings on three sets of radiographs, bone scintigraphy, CT and MRI. CT failed to identify a scaphoid fracture, which was present on 6 week radiographs, MRI and scintigraphy. The case illustrates that despite multidetector technology, CT still relies upon cortical and or trabecular displacement to demonstrate fractures.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case report
 Discussion
 References
 
The scaphoid is the most common carpal bone to fracture [1]. However the incidence, mechanism, natural history and treatment of such fractures remain controversial [1]. The fracture must be identified early, as immediate treatment is required to minimize the chances of non-union and thus avoiding disability [2]. Unfortunately, clinical examination and plain radiographs are unreliable diagnostic tools [2].

We present a case of suspected scaphoid fracture, where multistage radiographs, CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy were all performed. The discordance between imaging modalities shown in this case (Table 1Go) illustrates that despite multidetector technology, CT relies upon cortical and or trabecular displacement to demonstrate fractures.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Summary of imaging findings

 

    Case report
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case report
 Discussion
 References
 
A 19-year-old man presented to the accident and emergency department having fallen on his outstretched left hand. On clinical examination he was found to be tender in the anatomical snuffbox. Radiographs of four views (including a Stretchers/30 degree angled view) of his scaphoid were obtained, but no fracture was demonstrated (Figure 1aGo). His wrist was splinted and he attended follow up 10 days later. He remained tender in the snuffbox and four further radiographic views of his wrist were performed. Once again no fracture was identified (Figure 1bGo). On the same day he was referred for conventional 99Tcm-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) bone scintigraphy of his wrist. The scintigram showed increased MDP uptake in the scaphoid in keeping with a fracture (Figure 2Go). After scintigraphy the patient underwent 16 detector multislice CT. This was performed with the hand above the head and flat on the table. Images were acquired in the axial plane using 0.75 mm detectors and reconstructed in 0.5 mm slice widths. Images underwent multiplanar reconstruction and were viewed in interactive cine mode, but no fracture could be detected (Figure 3Go). As a result of these discrepant findings a 1.5 Tesla MRI examination of the wrist was undertaken 3 days later. On T1 weighted images there was reduced signal seen in the marrow of the proximal scaphoid consistent with oedema (Figure 4aGo). T2 weighted fat saturated images showed high signal in the proximal pole of the scaphoid and a suggestion of a linear low signal line transversing the proximal third of the bone (Figure 4bGo). Although the latter was equivocal it was thought to probably represent a fracture. The patient was treated for a scaphoid fracture and his wrist immobilized for 6 weeks. At this time further radiographs were performed which showed a fracture line at the lower pole (Figure 5Go).



View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. (a) Dorsopalmar radiograph of the left wrist on the day of injury with no evidence of fracture. (b) Dorsopalmar radiograph of the left wrist 10 days post trauma. No evidence of fracture is seen.

 


View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Local view of the hand from a 99Tcm-methylene diphosphonate labelled bone scintigram showing increased tracer uptake in the region of the left scaphoid.

 


View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Coronal reconstruction from a 16-detector multidetector CT of the left wrist 10 days post injury. The image was obtained using the 0.75 mm detectors and reconstructed in 0.5 mm intervals using a hard tissue algorithm. No fracture is identified.

 


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. (a) T1 weighted coronal MRI of the left wrist performed 13 days post trauma showing reduced signal in scaphoid. (b) Fat saturated T2 weighted coronal MRI of the left wrist performed 13 days post trauma showing high signal in the scaphoid. There is a suggestion of a fracture line in the proximal one third.

 


View larger version (182K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Dorsopalmar radiograph of the left wrist 6 weeks post injury. A fracture is identified affecting the proximal pole of the scaphoid.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case report
 Discussion
 References
 
The high sensitivity of skeletal scintigraphy in the detection of fractures is well established. For this reason, as well as its widespread availability, many investigators recommend its use in the detection of occult scaphoid fractures [24]. In recent years however, the increasing availability of MRI has led to its use in the diagnosis of various traumatic bone injuries, including scaphoid fracture. There are claims of benefit in diagnosis, cost and clinical impact using MRI [57].

CT has inherent advantages when examining high attenuation tissues such as bone. However, although methodology for examining the scaphoid successfully on CT has been described for many years [8], the use of CT to diagnose scaphoid fractures is rather limited. This may be the result in part of one early study, which suggested scintigraphy was significantly more sensitive than CT in the diagnosis of scaphoid fractures [4]. Since these early studies, the advent of multidetector technology has revolutionized the CT technique, allowing fine section, multiplanar reconstructions from isometric voxels at subminute examination times. These advances have led CT to exquisitely demonstrate bone cortex and trabecula pattern, which should in theory aid the detection of bone fracture. In this case, the isometric voxels allow multiplanar reconstructions through the long axis of the scaphoid and thus diminishes the necessity to perform true coronal sections of the wrist in ulnar deviation. These advances in CT have led our institution to investigate the potential use of this technology in diagnosing fractures.

Despite the most modern CT machines, with use of 0.5 mm sections and multiplanar examination, this case demonstrates the potential fallibility of the technique against the sensitivity of conventional scintigraphy and MRI. The case illustrates that despite multidetector technology, CT still relies upon cortical and/or trabecular displacement to demonstrate fractures.

Received for publication February 18, 2004. Revision received June 18, 2004. Accepted for publication August 13, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case report
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Kozin SH. Incidence, mechanism, and natural history of scaphoid fractures. Hand Clinics 2001;17:515–24.[Medline]
  2. Chakravarty D, Sloan J, Brenchley J. Risk reduction through skeletal scintigraphy as a screening tool in suspected scaphoid fracture: a literature review. Emerg Med J 2002;19:507–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Tiel-van Buul MM, Roolker W, Broekhuizen AH, van Beek EJ. The diagnostic management of suspected scaphoid fracture. Injury 1997;28:1–8.[Medline]
  4. Tiel-van Buul MM, van Beek EJ, Dijkstra P, Bakker AJ, Broekhuizen TH, van Royen EA. Significance of a hot spot on the bone scan after carpal injury-evaluation by computed tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 1993;20:159–64.[Medline]
  5. Dorsay TA, Major NM, Helms CA. Cost-effectiveness of immediate MR imaging versus traditional follow-up for revealing radiographically occult scaphoid fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:1257–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Mack MG, Keim S, Balzer JO, et al. Clinical impact of MRI in acute wrist fractures. Eur Radiol 2003;13:612–7.[Medline]
  7. Brydie A, Raby N. Early MRI in the management of clinical scaphoid fracture. Br J Radiol 2003;76:296–300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Bain GI, Bennett JD, Richards RS, Slethaug GP, Roth JH. Longitudinal computed tomography of the scaphoid; a new technique. Skeletal Radiol 1995;24:271–3.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. D. Welling, J. A. Jacobson, D. A. Jamadar, S. Chong, E. M. Caoili, and P. J. L. Jebson
MDCT and Radiography of Wrist Fractures: Radiographic Sensitivity and Fracture Patterns
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 10 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. M. Groves, I. Kayani, R. Syed, B. F. Hutton, P. P.W. Bearcroft, A. K. Dixon, and P. J. Ell
An international survey of hospital practice in the imaging of acute scaphoid trauma.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1453 - 1456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
H Requardt
Technology solutions for better outcomes: integrated information management in key to productivity increases in medicine
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2006; 79(937): 17 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. H. Thrall
Reinventing Radiology in the Digital Age Part III. Facilities, Work Processes, and Job Responsibilities
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 790 - 793.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A M Groves, H K Cheow, K K Balan, P W P Bearcroft, and A K Dixon
16 detector multislice CT versus skeletal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of wrist fractures: value of quantification of 99Tcm-MDP uptake
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2005; 78(933): 791 - 795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groves, A M
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, A K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Groves, A M
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, A K


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS