BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 740-744
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/28072039

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hinkley, H J
Right arrow Articles by Bird, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hinkley, H J
Right arrow Articles by Bird, D

Full Paper

Normative data for ultrasound measurement of the calcaneus within different female ethnic groups

H J Hinkley, PhD I P Drysdale, PhD, DO N J Walters, PhD and D Bird, BSc

British College of Osteopathic Medicine, 6 Netherhall Gardens, London NW3 5RR, UK


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The purpose of this study was to generate normative broadband ultrasound attenuation data for UK resident Indian-Asian, African-Caribbean and Chinese women, aged 20–80 years, using the McCue Cubaclinical II device. Additionally, comparisons were made against available Caucasian data previously collected by the authors. Exclusions were: use of hormone replacement therapy, corticosteroids or thyroxine for more than 6 months; menopause before the age of 45 years; oophrectomy; lactation within the preceding year; rheumatoid arthritis or a previous osteoporotic fracture. 977 women were recruited from various community centres, from a local GP surgery and from university colleges in the London area. Broadband ultrasound attenuation and velocity of sound were determined for the left and right os calces. Repeat measures on each side after re-positioning, to allow for anatomical variation, were averaged. Significance was set at a minimum level of 0.05. There were significant differences in non-dominant and dominant measures in all ethnic groups except African-Caribbean. For comparison purposes the means of the non-dominant measurements were plotted against age using a polynomial model to give the best data fit. No significant difference was found between non-dominant broadband ultrasound attenuation measurements for either Asian or Chinese when compared with the Caucasian sample populations. A significant difference in broadband ultrasound attenuation was found between African-Caribbean and Caucasian, with African-Caribbean between 10% (age group 20–30 years) and 29% (age group 70–80 years) higher. There was no significant difference in body mass index between Caucasian and Chinese groups, but significant differences were found between Caucasian and Asian, and between Caucasian and African-Caribbean groups.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) has been shown to be of predictive value in the assessment of osteoporotic fracture by both retrospective [13] and prospective studies [48]. Normative data for the Caucasian population has already been issued by the suppliers of the various machines utilizing ultrasound bone densitometry. With particular reference to the McCue Cubaclinical II system (which assesses the calcaneus) no such data exist for ethnic populations other than Caucasian. Thus all scans currently have to be compared with Caucasian data. This could create a potential error as it has been established that there are differences in bone mineral density (BMD) in different ethnic groups [9]. Previous studies using different technologies have found ethnic variations of bone composition. A large study (NHANES III) of USA men and women using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the hip showed both regional and ethnic differences across the USA [10], and a further study (NORA program) of ethnic groups using single energy X-ray absorptiometry (SXA) of the heel also showed differences [11]. The ultrasound wave is modified by both the BMD and by the microarchitectural structure of cancellous bone. This sensitivity to the combination of bone tissue characteristics is not found using DXA or SXA.

The aim of this study was to provide normative data using the McCue Cubaclinical II system for UK resident Indian-Asian, African-Caribbean and Chinese women aged 20–80 years, and to make comparisons with unpublished Caucasian data previously collected by the authors.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Female volunteers from Indian-Asian, African-Caribbean and Chinese populations, from community centres, university colleges and a GP surgery in the London area were used as an opportunistic sample. Informed consent was obtained using a format approved by the college Ethics Committee, with subject's anonymity maintained throughout. The community centres and GP surgery were sources of all ages, with the colleges providing mainly 20–29 year olds. A questionnaire was completed on interview, using interpreters if necessary, to determine eligibility for the study and background information, including handedness and diet. In the case of diet, subjects were asked to identify whether they had a westernised, traditional or mixed diet. The questionnaire enabled the following exclusion criteria to be applied: use of hormone replacement therapy, corticosteroids or thyroxine for more than 6 months; menopause before the age of 45 years; oophrectomy; lactation within the preceding year; rheumatoid arthritis; a previous osteoporotic fracture. Weight and height were measured at the time of ultrasound scanning.

Three trained operators used the McCue Cubaclinical II system to provide measurements of BUA and velocity of sound (VOS) for the left and right os calces. The measurement coefficient of variation of the three operators for BUA was 4%. The Cubaclinical incorporates a system of repeat measurements until 7 readings are within 5 dB MHz–1 from which an average is produced. The foot was measured three times in succession with the heel being re-positioned between each measurement to compensate for any minor anatomical variation and possible change in ultrasound coupling. The mean was then taken. Results were compared with a set of Caucasian women who satisfied the inclusion criteria and had been previously scanned at the British College of Osteopathic Medicine. For this group the mean was based on two or three measurements due to changes in clinic protocol over time. Each ethnic group was divided into age decades and compared using the Student's t-test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A total number of 977 women were assessed (Table 1Go) to provide normative data for four ethnic groups. Background information can be found in Table 2Go. A t-test showed no significant difference in body mass index (BMI) between all subjects in the Caucasian and Chinese groups but significant differences occurred between Caucasian and Asian/African-Caribbean groups, except for the Asian age range 70–80 years (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. The number of female subjects recruited per age group

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Demographics and anthropometry

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Differences in body mass index between Caucasian and each ethnic group: Student's t-test

 
A t-test was applied to the non-dominant versus dominant measures (Table 4Go). "Dominant" was defined as the foot with which one would kick a ball. There was a significant difference between non-dominant and dominant in each ethnic group except African-Caribbean. These differences were not always evident in individual age ranges. However, where an age range consists of a larger number of subjects, the overall data are skewed in favour of the larger group. Bilateral differences have previously been reported by the authors [12, 13].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Differences in non-dominant and dominant broadband ultrasound attenuation measurements: Student's t-test

 
For graphical presentation of normative data, age was plotted against the non-dominant BUA and VOS. A polynomial model gave a slightly better fit in each case (Table 5Go). Figure 1Go shows the linear regression lines for each ethnic group in comparison with the McCue Caucasian normative line. Non-dominant measurements and linear plots were chosen to be consistent with the published McCue data.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Regression analysis of broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA)/velocity of sound (VOS) against age – R2 – using linear and polynomial models

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Normative data. Linear regressions for mean non-dominant broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA).

 
Student's t-tests were applied to compare non-dominant BUA measurements for each ethnic group with Caucasian data (Table 6Go). A significant difference was found between Caucasian and African-Caribbean populations at each decade with African-Caribbean between 10% (age group 20–30 years) and 29% (age group 70–80 years) higher (Table 7Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Differences in non-dominant broadband ultrasound attenuation measurements between Caucasian and other ethnic groups: Student's t-test

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Mean non-dominant broadband ultrasound attenuation and confidence interval (95% CI) for each ethnic group

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study has generated normative data for different UK resident ethnic groups, enabling subsequent scans to be more appropriate. As found by other studies [14] a significant difference was found between African-Caribbean and Caucasian groups. The NORA program using SXA of the heel also showed African-American women to have the highest BMD and Asian the lowest [11].

Agreement to participate in the study was found to be greater at the community centres where workers could more easily organize the group. The membership of these centres tended to be amongst the older age groups, particularly in the case of the African-Caribbean and Chinese groups, making it difficult to access the younger age subjects. It was observed that the younger groups also had less interest in bone density scanning, since it was often perceived as an older person's problem. There was a perceived general lack of understanding of osteoporosis and health in general, particularly in the Indian-Asian community. A report by the National Osteoporosis Society in England in 1995 [15] explored the health education needs of South Asian communities in relation to osteoporosis and highlighted the general lack of knowledge in this area with language problems being a major barrier. Subjects were volunteers and therefore not a true random sample.

In all groups the polynomial regression line for BUA data illustrates a small decline between age groups 20 to 59 years followed by a sharper fall up to the age of 80 years. Comparisons can be made between this study and the findings of Langton [16] who also produced normative Caucasian data using the Cubaclinical system. Langton showed that the polynomial model gave a better fit when compared with the linear, and the spread of data and R2 values in the present study were very similar to those found by Langton.

The Indian-Asian and Chinese normative BUA data are not significantly different from that of the Caucasian population, but BUA of the African-Caribbean group is significantly higher than the Caucasian. These findings are in line with published data, which show that bone mass is greatest and fracture rate is lowest in those of African heritage [14]. It therefore seems logical that when measuring African-Caribbean women, the results should be interpreted against an appropriate normative data line.

A detailed analysis of diet and exercise factors, particularly in those subjects who have changed their lifestyle since residing in the UK, is the subject of future work. It can be seen (Figure 1Go) that in the case of the younger Chinese and Asian subjects, BUA values were marginally lower than Caucasian, although not statistically significant, whereas the older groups were slightly, but not significantly, higher. It is possible that the older groups performed more exercise when younger, for example an active young life followed by a more sedentary lifestyle once in the UK, although a number of the women scanned were attending gentle exercise classes run by the community centres.

When interpreting the graphs showing reduction of BUA with age, consideration should be given to the probability that a current 60–80-year-old is likely to have experienced a different and possibly healthier lifestyle in younger years, when they were building bone, compared with a current 20-year-old. The graphs for each ethnic group may therefore present an optimistic view, since a current 20-year-old may be expected to reach a lower bone density than that inferred by the graphs of age 80 years. This could result from starting from a lower initial baseline. Studies indicate that modern young persons' lifestyles are more likely to result in lower accrual of bone mass when compared with lifestyles of current 80 year olds when they were young [1723].


    Acknowledgments
 
Appreciation to the many people who supported this study by donating their time and to the participating community centre leaders, who assisted in organizing volunteers for the study. Thanks also to Melanie Shale who assisted with the Cubaclinical scanning.

Received for publication April 28, 2002. Revision received March 18, 2004. Accepted for publication April 6, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Stewart A, Reid DM, Porter RW. Broadband ultrasound attenuation and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with hip fractures: which technique discriminates fracture risk. Calcif Tissue Int 1994;54:466–9.[Medline]
  2. Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Genant HK, Stone K. Quantitative ultrasound and vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:353–8.[Medline]
  3. Schott AM, Weill-Engerer S, Hans D, Duboeuf F, Delams PD, Meunter PJ. Ultrasound discriminates patients with hip fracture equally as well as dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and independently of bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:243–9.[Medline]
  4. Porter RW, Muller CG, Grainger D, Palmer SB. Prediction of hip fracture in elderly women: a prospective study. BMJ 1990;301:638–41.
  5. Hans D, Dargent-Molina P, Schott AM, Sebert JL, Cormier C, Kotzki PO, et al. Ultrasonographic heel measurement to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study. The Lancet 1996;348:511–4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Stewart A, Torgerson DJ, Reid DM. Prediction of fractures in perimenopausal women: a comparison of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and broadband ultrasound attenuation. Ann Rheum Disease 1996;55:140–2.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Pluijm SMF, Graafmans WC, Bouter LM, Lips P. Ultrasound measurements for the prediction of osteoporotic fractures in elderly people. Abstract (F544) presented at ASBMR, Cincinnati, Sept 1997.
  8. Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Cauley JA, Vogt TM, Ensrud KE, Genant HK, et al. Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:629–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. World Health Organisation (WHO). Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO technical report series 843, 1994.
  10. Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP, et al. Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults 1998;8:468–89.
  11. Faulkner K, Miller P, Barrett-Connor E, Siris E, Abbott T, Berger M, et al. Age, ethnicity and bone mineral density at the heel. Evidence from the oseoporosis risk assessment (NORA) program. 1998; Abstract presented at ASBMR-IBMS joint meeting in San Francisco.
  12. Drysdale IP, Hinkley HJ, Shale M, Bird D, Walters NJ. Bilateral variation of calcaneal broadband attenuation – part I. J Clin Densitom 2001;4:37–42.[Medline]
  13. Drysdale IP, Hinkley HJ, Shale M, Bird D, Walters NJ. Bilateral variation of calcaneal broadband attenuation – part II – as measured by three bone densitometers employing ultrasound or X-ray. J Clin Densitom 2001;4:337–41.[Medline]
  14. Bohannon AD. Osteoporosis and African American women. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 1999;8:609–15.[Medline]
  15. Williams J, Goldthorpe C. Report to the National Osteoporosis Society, Bath, UK. Osteoporosis and South Asian Communities. 1995.
  16. Langton CM, Langton DK. Male and female normative data for ultrasound measurement of the calcaneus within the U.K. adult population. Br J Radiol 1997;70:580–5.[Abstract]
  17. Gregory J, et al. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: young people aged 4–18 years, I Findings. London: The Stationary Office, 2000.
  18. MORI. Young people and Sport National Survey - Sport England Research 1999.
  19. Wyshak G. Teenage girls, carbonated beverage consumption and bone fractures. Arch Paediatr Adolescent Med 2000;154:610–3.
  20. Crisp A, Sedgwick P, Joughin N, Humphrey H. Why may teenage girls persist in smoking? J Adolesc 1999;22:657–72.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Sutherland I, Willner P. Patterns of alcohol, cigarette and illicit drug use in English adolescents. Addiction 1998;93:1199–208.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Fehily AM. Dietary determinants of bone mass and fracture risk: a review. J Human Nutn Diet 1989;2:299–313.
  23. Keay N. The modifiable factors affecting bone mineral accumulation in girls: the paradoxical effect of exercise on bone. Brit Nutr Found, Nutr Bulletin 2000;25:219–22.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hinkley, H J
Right arrow Articles by Bird, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hinkley, H J
Right arrow Articles by Bird, D


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS