British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 441-444
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/32305979
Coronary subclavian steal syndrome: non-invasive imaging and percutaneous repair
I A Wright, PhD,
A D Laing, FRACR and
T M Buckenham, FRCR, MBChB
Department of Radiology, Christchurch Hospital, Private Bag 4710, Christchurch, New Zealand
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Although coronary subclavian steal syndrome (CSSS) is relatively uncommon, it is a well documented cause of graft failure in patients having undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using the left internal mammary artery (LIMA). Here we report a case of CSSS induced by restenosis of a left subclavian artery (SCA) origin stent, identified by increased velocities within the stent and an abnormal ipsilateral vertebral artery (VA) waveform on Duplex ultrasound imaging. This was successfully treated percutaneously by re-stenting, resulting in restoration of normal SCA waveforms and velocities, and normalization of the ipsilateral VA waveform.
 |
Case report
|
|---|
A 66-year-old female ex-smoker with hypercholesterolaemia was admitted with fatigue, lethargy and shortness of breath on exertion which had gradually worsened over the preceding few months, and left arm pain on sustained movement. She had a history of right heart failure, tricuspid regurgitation, haemolytic anaemia, chronic atrial fibrillation and hyperthyroidism, and had previously undergone three mitral valve replacements (most recently 5 years prior) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), coronary artery stenting (2 years prior) and left subclavian artery (SCA) stenting (1 year prior). The long saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery (LIMA) were used as conduits in the coronary artery bypass. Physical examination revealed a bruit over the left clavicle, and a difference in blood pressure between the right and left arm of 60 mmHg. Recent coronary angiography had shown retrograde flow in the LIMA graft on injection of the left coronary arteries. Duplex ultrasound demonstrated a 90% proximal left SCA stenosis, with velocities in excess of 3 m s1 noted within the stent (Figure 1
), and an abnormal Doppler waveform in the left vertebral artery (VA) (Figure 2
). Arch angiography confirmed a 90% stenosis within the left SCA stent, and demonstrated antegrade VA flow and an absence of antegrade LIMA flow, the latter being confirmed on selective left SCA injection (Figure 3
). Left common and internal carotid artery origin stenoses of 50% and 90%, respectively, were also identified, and the right VA was shown to be diffusely diseased. The SCA stenosis was successfully dilated and an 8 mm x 4 cm balloon expandable stent placed with no complications (Figure 4
). Duplex ultrasound 24 h later demonstrated normal Doppler waveforms and velocities within the stent (Figure 5a
), and conversion of the left VA waveform to a normal pattern (Figure 5b
). The patient was subsequently discharged having also undergone several blood transfusions to manage her haemolytic anaemia. She was asymptomatic on review 2 months later, at which time follow-up Duplex ultrasound showed normal left VA and SCA waveforms and velocities.

View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Duplex ultrasound image of the proximal left subclavian artery (SCA) prior to restenting; velocities of over 3 m s1 are demonstrated within the stent.
|
|

View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Corresponding Duplex ultrasound image of the left vertebral artery showing an abnormal waveform. Antegrade flow is present throughout the whole cardiac cycle but there is marked mid-systolic deceleration.
|
|

View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Angiogram of the left subclavian artery and its branches showing a severe in-stent stenosis at the subclavian origin and an absence of antegrade internal mammary artery filling.
|
|

View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Angiogram of the left subclavian artery and its branches showing successful dilatation of the subclavian stenosis, new stent placement and restoration of antegrade internal mammary artery flow.
|
|

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. (a) Duplex ultrasound image of the proximal left subclavian artery (SCA) post stent placement, with normal waveform and velocities. (b) Duplex ultrasound image of the left vertebral artery (VA) displaying a normal antegrade waveform post subclavian artery stent placement.
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
A steal occurs when there is a pressure gradient between the donor and recipient arteries [1], as commonly seen in vertebral subclavian steal syndrome (VSSS). In coronary subclavian steal syndrome (CSSS), however, both the coronary artery (donor) and the SCA (recipient) are stenosed and therefore it is unlikely that a pressure gradient would exist. It would appear that myocardial ischaemia is likely to be a result of the haemodynamic disturbance caused by the functional coronary circulation which includes the proximal left SCA and its branches. The incidence of CSSS is less than 0.5% [2, 3]. It is caused by a significant SCA stenosis present at the time of CABG, or may occur post-CABG following the progression of SCA disease, as in this case.
The incidence of CSSS due to missed significant SCA disease is unclear, but Marques et al [4] report an incidence in patients referred for CABG of significant SCA stenosis of 0.7%. In order to detect the presence of a SCA stenosis prior to cardiac surgery, many authors advocate bilateral upper limb blood pressure measurement and/or subclavian auscultation [210]. A difference in pressure of at least 20 mmHg between the two arms has a high positive predictive value for the presence of a significant SCA stenosis [28, 11], but is not always present owing to a well-formed collateral circulation [4] or the presence of diffuse atherosclerotic disease [3].
Given that many CABG patients will undergo carotid Duplex ultrasound as part of their pre-operative assessment, surprisingly few authors refer to evaluation of the VA Doppler waveform as a predictor of concomitant SCA disease, which is usually assessed during a carotid scan as a matter of routine. Marques et al [4] include the presence of partial or permanent flow reversal in the VA as one of three indications for pre-CABG prophylactic SCA stenosis treatment, acknowledging that even a mild proximal SCA stenosis can alter the VA waveform, although they do not describe the changes in VA waveform in detail. Completely retrograde or bi-directional VA flow are well documented, highly sensitive indicators of occlusion or significant (>50% diameter) stenosis of the ipsilateral SCA, respectively [1216], although the correlation between the degree of change in VA waveform and the severity of ipsilateral SCA disease is only moderate. The presence of a mid-systolic notch during antegrade VA flow, as in the "bunny" waveform [14], appears sensitive to moderate (>45% diameter) SCA stenosis [1315]. Infrequently, provocative tests are required to identify stress-induced VSSS, although the findings at rest will show antegrade vertebral flow that is significantly attenuated compared with the contralateral VA [17, 18]. The negative predictive value of a normal antegrade VA Doppler waveform is not well documented, presumably due to the unavailability of angiographic confirmation of the absence of SCA disease. Hence even slight alteration in the VA waveform should result in the direct identification of SCA disease, or at least strong suspicion of its presence which warrants further investigation if the lesion is not visible on Duplex.
In the presence of significant coronary artery disease, it would seem surprising that a significant SCA lesion would cause a coronary rather than a vertebral subclavian steal. At least one previous case report [19] acknowledges that CSSS occurred in a patient whose LIMA was anastomosed to a coronary artery whose degree of stenosis had initially been overestimated by suboptimal angiography. Their patient also had retrograde ipsilateral VA flow. Indeed, many reports imply [3, 6, 2023] or explicitly note [2, 5, 2426] retrograde VA filling in the presence of a coronary steal. Hence it would appear likely that concomitant vertebral and coronary subclavian steal is common, although there are two case reports [11, 27] demonstrating CSSS without reversal of vertebral flow in the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis. However, it would appear that our case is unique in the literature by virtue of the presence of antegrade vertebral flow interrupted in mid systole by a sharp deceleration (a "bunny" waveform).
There exist a range of treatment options for CSSS. Direct transthoracic revascularization (aorta to SCA bypass) and extrathoracic carotid-subclavian bypass [2, 3, 10] are popular procedures. There are few reports of the use of directional subclavian arthrectomy [11], or SCA recanalization using laser guide wire angioplasty [25]. In more recent years percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting have been the treatments of choice of CSSS [46]. To our knowledge no previous cases of CSSS secondary to in-stent restenosis have been reported, and in this case re-dilatation and re-stenting of the left SCA were performed.
Although few authors advocate diagnostic Duplex ultrasound as the primary imaging modality, in this case we were able to confirm the diagnosis of CSSS non-invasively allowing the patient to proceed directly to endovascular repair. We report what appears to be a previously unreported CSSS VA Doppler waveform and its resolution after successful percutaneous revascularization.
Received for publication January 20, 2003.
Revision received June 16, 2003.
Accepted for publication August 20, 2003.
 |
References
|
|---|
- Elian D, Gerniak A, Guetta V, Jones M, Agranat O, Har-Zahav Y, et al. Subclavian coronary steal syndrome: an obligatory common fate between subclavian artery, internal mammary graft and coronary circulation. Cardiology 2002;97:1759.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Tyras DH, Barner HB. Coronary-subclavian steal. Arch Surg 1977;112:11257.[Abstract]
- Takach TJ, Reul GJ, Gregoric I, Krajcer Z, Duncan JM, Livesay JJ, et al. Concomitant subclavian and coronary artery disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:1879.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Marques KMH, Ernst SMPG, Mast EG, Bal ET, Suttorp MJ, Plokker HWT. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the left subclavian artery to prevent or treat the coronary-subclavian steal syndrome. Am J Cardiol 1996;78:68790.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Kneale BJ, Irvine AT, Coltart DJ. Coronary subclavian steal syndrome following coronary bypass surgery. Postgrad Med J 1996;72:35860.[Abstract]
- Stagg SJ, Abben RP, Chaisson GA, Kowalski JM, Ladd WR, Meldahl RV, et al. Management of the coronary-subclavian steal syndrome with balloon angioplasty. Angiology 1994;45:72531.
- Lobato EB, Kern KB, Bauder-Heit J, Hughes L, Sulek CA. Incidence of coronary-subclavian syndrome in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anaesth 2001;15:68992.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Olsen CO, Dunton RF, Maggs PR, Lahey SJ. Review of coronary-subclavian steal following internal mammary artery-coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1988;46:6758.[Abstract]
- Van Son JAM, Aengevaeren WR, Skotnicki SH, Barentsz JO, van de Wal HJ, Buskens FGM. Diagnosis and management of the coronary-subclavian steal syndrome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1989;3:5657.[Abstract]
- Saydjari R, Upp JR, Wolma FJ. Coronary-subclavian steal syndrome following coronary artery bypass grafting. Cardiology 1991;78:537.[Medline]
- Breall JA, Grossman W, Stillman IE, Gianturco LE, Kim D. Arthrectomy of the subclavian artery for patients with symptomatic coronary-subclavian steal syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:15647.[Abstract]
- Corson JD, Menzoian JO, LoGerfo FW. Reversal of vertebral artery blood flow demonstrated by Doppler ultrasound. Arch Surg 1977;112:7159.[Abstract]
- Von Reutern GM, Pourcelot L. Cardiac-cycle dependent alternating flow in vertebral arteries with subclavian artery stenoses. Stroke 1978;9:22936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kliewer MA, Hertzberg BS, Kim DH, Bowie JD, Courneya DL, Carroll BA. Vertebral artery Doppler waveform changes indicating subclavian steal physiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:8159.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Yip PK, Liu HM, Hwang BS, Chen RC. Subclavian steal phenomenon: a correlation between duplex sonographic and angiographic findings. Neuroradiology 1992;34:27982.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Nicolau C, Gilabert R, Chamorro A, Vanquez F, Bargallo N, Bru C. Doppler sonography of the intertransverse segment of the vertebral artery. J Ultrasound Med 2000;19:4753.[Abstract]
- Landwehr P, Schulte O, Voshage G. Ultrasound examination of carotid and vertebral arteries. Eur Radiol 2001;11:152134.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Bendick PJ, Glover JL. Haemodynamic evaluation of vertebral arteries by duplex ultrasound. Surg Clin N Am 1990;70:23544.
- Latific-Jasnic D, Zorman D, Cijan A, Rakovec P. Unusual subclavian steal phenomenon. Tex Heart Inst J 1994;21:2367.[Medline]
- Ochi M, Yamauchi S, Yajima T, Bessho R, Tanaka S. Simultaneous subclavian artery reconstruction in coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:12847.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Harjola PT, Valle M. The importance of aortic arch or subclavian angiography before coronary reconstruction. Chest 1974;66:4368.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Chung DA, Large SR. Relocation of the internal mammary artery graft in a case of coronary-subclavian steal. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;48:3940.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Diethrich EB, Cozacov JC. Subclavian stent implantation to alleviate coronary steal through a patent internal mammary artery graft. J Endovasc Surg 1995;2:7780.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Hallisey MJ, Rees JH, Meranze SG, Siegfeld A, Lowe R. Use of angioplasty in the prevention and treatment of coronary-subclavian steal syndrome. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1995;6:1259.[Medline]
- Eggebrecht H, Naber CK, Oldenburg O, Herrmann J, Haude M, Erbel R, et al. Percutaneous transluminal laser guide wire recanalisation of chronic subclavian artery occlusion in symptomatic coronary-subclavian steal syndrome. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;51:5004.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Aseem WM, Makaroun MS. Bilateral subclavian steal syndrome through different paths and from different sites. Angiology 1999;50:14952.
- Rossum AC, Steel SR, Hartshorne MF. Evaluation of coronary subclavian steal syndrome using sestamibi imaging and duplex scanning with observed vertebral subclavian steal. Clin Cardiol 2000;23:2269.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Jones, T. Athanasiou, P. P. Tekkis, V. Malinovski, S. Purkayastha, A. Haq, J. Kokotsakis, and A. Darzi
Does Doppler echography have a diagnostic role in patency assessment of internal thoracic artery grafts?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
November 1, 2005;
28(5):
692 - 700.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|