BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 250-252
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/20564274

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mak, C W
Right arrow Articles by Chang, J M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mak, C W
Right arrow Articles by Chang, J M

Case report

Ultrasound diagnosis of paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma

C W Mak, MD 1 C K Chou, MD 1 C C Su, MD 2 S K Huan, MD 3 and J M Chang, MD 1

Departments of 1 Diagnostic Radiology, 2 Pathology and 3 Urology, Chi-Mei Foundation Medical Centre, Tainan, Taiwan, Republic of China


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case report
 Discussion
 References
 
Rhabdomyosarcoma is the most common tumour of the lower genitourinary tract in children in the first two decades. Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma is associated with a significantly better outcome than lesions elsewhere in the genitourinary tract. Although ultrasound is considered the imaging modality of choice for evaluating intrascrotal pathology, the ultrasound appearance of paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma has rarely been reported and may be confused with other disease entities such as epididymitis, adenomatoid tumour and leiomyoma. We present the ultrasound features of a paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma, discussing the clinical features and differential diagnosis.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case report
 Discussion
 References
 
Although rhabdomyosarcoma has been recognised as one of the most common forms of childhood solid tumour, occurring with a frequency similar to that of Wilms' tumour and neuroblastoma [1], paratesticular rhabdomyosarcomas are extremely rare. The majority of these tumours occur in the first two decades of life and belong to the embryonal histopathologic subtype [2].

Although ultrasound has been considered the image modality of choice in differentiating intratesticular from extratesticular pathology, reports on the ultrasound features of paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma is limited and pre-operative diagnosis may be difficult. Because of the highly aggressive nature of paratesticular rhabdomyosarcomas, early diagnosis is important, as patients with disease localized to scrotum have a good prognosis [3].


    Case report
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case report
 Discussion
 References
 
A 14-year-old boy visited the outpatient department with a 1 month history of left scrotal swelling. Initially, the scrotal swelling had been ignored but as the scrotum progressively enlarged, medical help was sought. There was no relevant past medical history, and the patient denied a history of scrotal trauma or infection.

Physical examination revealed a tender mass occupying the whole of the left hemiscrotum. Transillumination test was positive. The right testis was normal. There were no palpable inguinal lymph nodes.

A clinical diagnosis of hydrocele with epididymitis was made and an ultrasound examination was arranged. High resolution ultrasound using a 10 MHz linear transducer demonstrated a 6 cm x 5 cm extratesticular hypoechoic mass in the left scrotum (Figure 1Go), the mass was found to be hypervascular when colour Doppler was applied (Figure 2Go), no central hypoechoic lesion indicative of tumour necrosis was seen within the mass. The left testis was intact and could be well delineated from the extratesticular mass. A non-septated hydrocele was found in the left scrotum (Figure 1Go). The left epididymal tail was not seen. The right testis and epididymis were unremarkable. An abdominal CT examination showed no evidence of retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. Laboratory test results, including a chemistry panel of serum alpha feto protein, and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin were normal. Orchidectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy were suggested but rejected by the patient's parent, hence epididymectomy and orchipexy were performed. On operation a 10 cm x 5 cm x 5 cm brownish colour firm mass arising from the left spermatic cord was found, en-bloc excision was done with preservation of the left testis. Neither haemorrhage nor necrosis were identified within the mass. Pathology showed that this mass was a myxoid tumour composed of pleomorphic cells (Figure 3aGo).



View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Longituidinal section (composite image) of high resolution ultrasound shows a well defined hypoechoic extratesticular mass (arrows) was found in the left scrotum, hydrocele was also present.

 


View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Colour Doppler ultrasound shows that the mass was hypervascular (arrow).

 


View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. (a) Pathologically, this tumour was a myxoid tumour, and composed of pleomorphic cells (haematoxylin & eosin stain x 400). (b) Immunohistochemical stain using desmin ( x 400) showed that these cells were postive for desmin, and showed cytoplasmic striation (arrowhead).

 
Immunohistochemically, these cells were positive for desmin, but negative for smooth muscle actin, and showed cytoplasmic striation (Figure 3bGo) suggestive of rhabdomyosarcoma. After the operation, chemotherapy was recommended but was again rejected. Tumour recurrence was seen in the left scrotum 2 months after the operation, consisting of a hypoechoic vascular mass located cephalad to the left testicle, calcifications were seen within the mass (Figure 4Go). Finally, the patient's parent agreed to accept radical orchitectomy. A 12 cm x 6 cm x 5 cm well demarcated tumour was found attached to the spermatic cord during the operation. Pathology confirmed that this was recurrent rhabdomyosarcoma. The patient was subsequently treated with chemotherapy using endoxan and pharmarubicin.



View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Ultrasound (transverse section) shows recurrent hypoechoic tumour located cephalad to the left testicle, calcifications are seen within the recurrent tumour (arrows).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case report
 Discussion
 References
 
Ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice for patients with suspected scrotal abnormalities, and is accurate in distinguishing intratesticular from extratesticular lesions. Although most of the extratesticular lesions are benign, malignancy does occur; the most common malignant tumours in infants and children are rhabdomyosarcomas [4]. Rhabdomyosarcoma may develop anywhere in the body, and 4% occur in the paratesticular region [3].

Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma is one of the most common non-germinal neoplasms affecting the scrotal contents in children and adolescents. Clinically, the patient usually presents with non-specific complaints of a unilateral, painless intrascrotal swelling not associated with fever. Transillumination test is positive when a hydrocele is present, often resulting in a misdiagnosis of epididymitis, which is more commonly associated with hydrocele.

Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcomas usually spread to lymph nodes such as the paraaortic, paracaval nodal region but rarely to the inguinal lymph nodes, unless tumour invasion of the scrotal skin has occurred [1]. The most common distant sites of metastasis are cortical bone, bone marrow and lungs through haematogenous spread [5].

Descriptions of the ultrasound findings of paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma are limited and variable. In 1989, Solvietti and Tannous [6, 7] described this tumour as an echo-poor mass with or without hydrocele. However, other reports [8, 9] suggested high reflectivity in the epididymis in association with reduced reflectivity of the testicle when the tumour has invaded into the testis.

In 1995, Wood and Dewbury [9] first described the Doppler ultrasound features in a 17-year-old boy as a highly reflective soft tissue mass located in the epididymis, with increased vascularity on colour Doppler, which they initially considered to be epididymitis. Progressive swelling of the scrotum occurred and a scrotal malignancy was suspected 6 months later, when ultrasound disclosed a swollen testis with decreased echogenicity and no discernable plane detected between the testis and the epididymal mass, illustrating that differentiating rhabdomyosarcoma from epididymitis may be difficult.

In the present case, epididymitis was suspected initially as the patient presented with tender mass in the scrotum and transillumination test was positive. At ultrasound, the region of the epididymis was found to be occupied by a hypervascular mass with mixed echogenicity, indistinguishable from epididymitis. However, correlation of the ultrasound features with the clinical findings of a growing scrotal mass in a young children led us to suspect pre-operatively the diagnosis of a paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma. In our opinion when encountering an enlarged intrascrotal extratesticular mass with hypervascularity, the following points may be helpful in differentiating a rhabdomyosarcoma from epididymitis:

(1) young age

(2) gradual enlargement of testis, not acute onset of symptoms

Other solid extratesticular masses which should be considered in the differential diagnosis include adenomatoid tumours and leiomyomas. The ultrasound features of adenomatoid tumour are of a well defined round shaped mass having variable echogenicity [10], usually occurring in the third and fourth decades. Ultrasound reports of scrotal leiomyoma have described this tumour as a solid hypoechoic or heterogeneous mass [11], which may or may not contain calcification, sharp shadows not induced by calcification corresponding to transition zones between the various tissue components of the mass have also reported as a specific feature of leiomyoma [12].

Our case also illustrates the aggressive nature of paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma. Previous reports suggest that this tumour is associated with a good prognosis when the tumour is localized within the scrotum, and orchitectomy should be followed by chemotherapy [3]. However, in our case this standard treatment protocol was initially rejected with consequent tumour recurrence in a very short term, just 2 months after epididymectomy. Again this emphasises the importance of early diagnosis and proper treatment before metastasis to the other organs occurred.

In conclusion, when encountering a solid extratesticular mass in a young patient, rhabdomyosarcoma should be suspected. If the clinical onset is acute and associated with reactive hydrocele, epididymitis should be considered, if not rhabdomyosarcoma is more likely.

Received for publication February 28, 2003. Revision received June 2, 2003. Accepted for publication June 23, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case report
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Raney RB Jr, Hays DM, Lawrence W Jr, Soule EH, Tefft M, Donaldson MH. Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma in childhood. Cancer 1978;42:729–36.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Agrons GA, Wagner BJ, Lonergan GJ, Dickey GE, Kaufman MS. Genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma in children: radiologic–pathologic correlation. Radiographics 1997;17:919–37.[Abstract]
  3. Hamilton CR, Pinkerton R, Horwich A. The management of paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma. Clin Radiol 1989;40:314–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Green DM. Testicular tumors in infants and children. Semin Surg Oncol 1986;2:156–62.[Medline]
  5. Bhushan B, Mohan V, Salker DM. Ultrasound diagnosis of paratesticular neoplasm. J Clin Ultrasound 1996;24:375–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Solvietti FB, D'Ascenzo R, Molisso A, et al. Rhabdomyosarcoma of the funiculus. J Clin Ultrasound 1989;17:521–2.[Medline]
  7. Tannous WN, Azouz EM, Homsy YL, et al. CT and ultrasound of pelvic rhabdomyosarcoma in children. Pediatr Radiol 1989;19:530–4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Goff WB, Lawrence DP, Deweese RA. Rhabdomyosarcoma of the testicular appendage in an infant: case report. Clin Pediatr 1990;29:412–3.
  9. Wood A, Dewbury KC. Case report: paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma-colour Doppler appearances. Clin Radiol 1995;50:130–1.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Hricak H, Filly RA. Sonography of the scrotum. Invest Radiol 1983;18:112–21.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Leonhardt WC, Gooding GA. Sonography of the epididymal leiomyoma. Urology 1993;41:262–4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA, Hertzberg MA, Distell BM. Epididymal leiomyoma: sonographic features. J Ultrasound Med 1996;15:797–9.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Sung, W. F. J. Riedlinger, D. A. Diamond, and J. S. Chow
Solid Extratesticular Masses in Children: Radiographic and Pathologic Correlation
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 483 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. Aso, G. Enriquez, M. Fite, N. Toran, C. Piro, J. Piqueras, and J. Lucaya
Gray-Scale and Color Doppler Sonography of Scrotal Disorders in Children: An Update
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1197 - 1214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mak, C W
Right arrow Articles by Chang, J M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mak, C W
Right arrow Articles by Chang, J M


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS