BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Görg, C
Right arrow Articles by Dietrich, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Görg, C
Right arrow Articles by Dietrich, J
British Journal of Radiology 75 (2002),919-929 © 2002 The British Institute of Radiology

Pictorial review

Colour Doppler ultrasound flow patterns in the portal venous system

C Görg, MD, J Riera-Knorrenschild, MD and J Dietrich, MD

Department of Internal Medicine, Philipps-University, Baldingerstraße, 35043 Marburg, Germany


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Physiological flow pattern
 Pathological flow patterns
 Conclusion
 References
 
Doppler ultrasound is a well established method for assessment of the portal venous system to detect the direction of portal blood flow. It is helpful for non-invasive diagnosis of intra-abdominal portosystemic shunts, especially in patients with cirrhosis. Less attention has been paid to other influences on portal venous flow, e.g. tricuspid regurgitation, increased hepatic out-flow resistence, respiratory cycle. The aim of this pictorial review is to describe the spectrum of physiological and pathological Doppler ultrasound flow patterns in the portal venous system.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Physiological flow pattern
 Pathological flow patterns
 Conclusion
 References
 
Several physiological and pathological Doppler ultrasound flow patterns of the portal vein and/or its branches are known (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Doppler ultrasound flow patterns in the portal venous system

 
Principal determinants of portal venous pulsatility may include retrograde trans-sinusoidal transmission of atrial pulsation [1], the respiratory cycle [2] and transmission of vena caval, hepatic arterial or splanchnic arterial pulsations [2].


    Physiological flow pattern
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Physiological flow pattern
 Pathological flow patterns
 Conclusion
 References
 
In healthy adults, portal venous flow has been described as being continuous hepatopetal on Doppler ultrasound [3] (Figure 1Go). Minimal variations caused by respiration and cardiac cycle are evident (Figure 2Go). Two different scoring systems for quantification of portal venous modulation have been used.



View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Doppler ultrasound of the portal vein with a continuous hepatopetal flow in a healthy adult.

 


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Doppler ultrasound of the portal vein with minimal pulsatile modulation of the portal flow in a healthy adult.

 
Portal vein pulsatility is characterized by the ratio between minimum and peak portal vein velocities [4]. A pulsatility ratio >0.54 was found in over 90% of normal individuals [5]. The venous pulsatility index [(maximum frequency shift-minimum frequency shift)/maximum frequency shift] was 0.48±0.31 (mean±standard deviation) in healthy adults [2].

Recently, even marked pulsatile hepatopetal flow of the portal vein has been described, particularly in thin subjects with a venous pulsatility index of >0.5 (Figure 3Go), with an inverse correlation to body mass [2]. Decreased pulsatility has been observed when the patient is sitting and during deep inspiration, and in obese subjects [1]. It has been suggested that abdominal pressure is the common factor affecting portal vein pulsatility in these subjects [2].



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Doppler ultrasound of the portal vein with marked pulsatile modulation of the portal flow in a thin, healthy adult.

 

    Pathological flow patterns
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Physiological flow pattern
 Pathological flow patterns
 Conclusion
 References
 
Different pathological flow patterns of portal venous blood flow exist (Table 1Go). A marked pulsatile hepatopetal or hepatofugal flow in the portal vein and/or its branches is seen under pathological conditions, tricuspid regurgitation, increased hepatic outflow resistance, liver diseases.

Pulsatile flow in the portal vein has predominantly been found in patients with severe right heart failure (Figure 4Go), demonstrating right atrial pressure negatively correlated with portal vein pulsatility ratio [6]. All patients with hepatofugal pulsatile flow were in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV [6]. A pulsatile hepatopetal flow was found more often in patients with NYHA Class I or II [6]. Pathophysiologically tricuspid regurgitation is the predominantly suggested cause for the duplex Doppler ultrasound phenomena of pulsatile portal vein flow [7].



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Colour Doppler ultrasound of the hepatic vein and portal vein in a patient with heart failure, New York Heart Association Calss III and tricuspid regurgitation (left), having a triphasic flow in the hepatic vein (middle) and a marked pulsatile flow of the portal vein (right).

 
Additionally, portal vein–hepatic vein fistula [8] and portocaval shunts may cause pulsatile portal flow [9].

Recently it has been assumed that severe pulmonary hypertension is responsible for a second pathophysiological mechanism that may induce hepatopetal or hepatofugal pulsatile portal vein flow, irrespective of degree of tricuspid regurgitation [10, 11]. In cases with constrictive pericarditis (Figure 5Go) and mediastinal haematoma (Figure 6Go), pericardial cyst, pericardial effusion (Figure 7Go) or right atrial tumour (Figure 8Go), the high right atrial pressure is presumably responsible for a pressure-related hepatic venous out-flow block with subsequent trans-sinusoidal hepatoportal shunting, similar to the mechanical outflow block that causes reversed pulsatile flow in liver cirrhosis (Figure 9Go) [12]. In patients with chronic hepatitis C, marked pulsatility in the portal vein has been associated with inflammation but not with other parameters of the histological activity index or intrahepatic fat deposition [13].



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Colour Doppler ultrasound in a patient with constrictive pericarditis (arrows) (left). A triphasic flow is seen in the hepatic vein (middle) and pulsatile flow in the portal vein (right). RV, right ventricle.

 


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Colour Doppler ultrasound of the hepatic vein and portal vein in a patient with mediastinal haematoma. A triphasic flow is seen in the hepatic vein (left) and a pulsatile flow with a reversed component of the portal vein (right).

 


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Colour Doppler ultrasound in a patient with pericardial effusion (left), and triphasic flow in the liver vein (middle) and pulsatile flow in the portal vein (right).

 


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Colour Doppler ultrasound in a patient with primary cardial lymphoma with a tumour in the right atrium (left), triphasic flow in the hepatic vein (middle) and pulsatile flow in the portal vein (right).

 


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Colour Doppler ultrasound of the hepatic vein (LV) and portal vein (VP) in a patient with liver cirrhosis having a monophasic flow in the hepatic vein (left) and a marked pulsatile flow of the portal vein (right).

 
A less well understood mechanism for reversed portal flow leads to hepatofugal flow in the portal vein and/or its branches. It is well known that the respiratory cycle modulates portal venous flow via intra-abdominal pressure (Figure 10Go) [1, 2]. High abdominal pressure during deep inspiration may cause reversal flow in patients with severe right heart failure or liver disease (Figure 11Go) and may be seen only in peripheral branches of the portal venous system (Figure 12Go). Under certain circumstances, even in patients with the absence of cardiac and liver disease a short time reversed portal vein flow can be seen during deep inspiration using color Doppler ultrasound (Figure 13Go).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10. Colour Doppler ultrasound of the portal vein (left and middle) in a patient with heart failure, New York Heart Association Calss III, having a marked pulsatile flow with reversed flow during deep inspiration (arrows) (right).

 


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 11. Doppler ultrasound in a patient with a pericardial effusion (PE) (left) and a pulsatile flow in the portal vein with a short reversed flow during deep inspiration (arrow) (right). RV, right ventricle; LV, left ventricle.

 


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 12. Colour Doppler ultrasound of the splenic vein (left and middle) in a patient with liver cirrhosis, oesophageal varices and ascites. Arrows indicate flow direction. A marked pulsatile flow was seen in the portal venous system with reversed flow in the hilar splenic vein during deep inspiration (arrow, right).

 


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 13. Colour Doppler ultrasound of the portal vein (left and middle) in a patient 1 week post-gastrectomy. Arrows indicate flow direction. During normal inspiration (arrow A) a breath dependent reversed flow was seen (right).

 
It is generaly accepted that colour Doppler ultrasound enables the detection of the presence and direction of blood flow in the portal venous system. Continuous hepatofugal flow in the portal vein trunk is found with an overall prevalence of 8.3% in patients with liver cirrhosis [14] (Figure 14Go). Prevalence did not differ in relation to the aetiology of liver cirrhosis. However, reversed flow was found more often in patients classified as Child's B and C cirrhosis than those classified as Child's A cirrhosis [14]. Reversed portal venous blood flow develops when the intrahepatic resistance is greater than the resistance of portosystemic collaterals. It is likely that the increase of intrahepatic resistance owing to structural abnormalities, i.e. hepatic vein sclerosis, Disse space collagenization and hepatocyte enlargement, plays the predominant role in the developement of reversed portal flow [15]. A possible association has been found between abnormal flow direction and the presence of oesophageal varices, ascites and spontaneous portosystemic shunts, with the strongest association being with shunts [16]. Analysis of the direction of flow in the portal vein is therefore strongly warranted in assessing portal hypertension. Various haemodynamic patterns with reversed flow do exist (Figures 15 and 16GoGo). The clinical significance of this Doppler phenomenon is still unclear, but it may play a protective role against future risk of bleeding [14].



View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 14. (a) Colour Doppler ultrasound of the portal venous system in a patient with alcoholic fatty liver cirrhosis and continuous hepatofugal flow in the portal vein (the arrows indicate flow direction). (b) The same patient had hepatofugal flow in the mesenteric vein (left) and regular hepatopetal flow in the splenic vein (right). Arrows indicate flow direction.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 15. Four different haemodynamic flow patterns of continuous flow in the portal vein, the splenic vein and the mesenteric vein (Gaiani S, et al. 1991 [14]). (a) Isolated reversed flow in the mesenteric vein. (b) Isolated reversed flow in the splenic vein. (c) Reversed flow in the portal vein and the splenic vein. (d) Reversed flow in the portal vein and the mesenteric vein.

 


View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 16. (a) Colour Doppler ultrasound of the portal venous system in a patient with liver cirrhosis and continuous hepatofugal flow in the portal vein (left) and hepatopetal flow in the mesenteric vein (VMS) (right). Arrows indicate flow direction. (b) The same patient had reversed flow in the splenic vein (left). The splenic vein (VL) drained into a large perirenal collateral. Arrows indicate flow direction.

 
Additionally, continuous reversed portal flow has been described in iatrogenic portosystemic shunts (Figure 17Go), Budd–Chiari syndrome [17] (Figure 18Go), cavernous transformation of the main portal vein (Figure 19Go) and veno-occlusive liver disease after bone marrow transplantation [18].



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 17. Colour Doppler ultrasound of the portal vein in a patient with liver cirrhosis and a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) (left). In the umbilical segment of the portal vein a reversed flow was seen (right). Arrows indicate flow direction.

 


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 18. Colour Doppler ultrasound of the portal vein in a patient with breast cancer, diffuse metastative disease of the liver and occlusion of the hepa-tic veins (Budd-Chiari syndrome) (arrows left). In the portal vein a reversed flow was seen (middle, right). Arrows indicate flow direction. VC, vena cava.

 


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 19. Colour Doppler ultrasound in a patient with cavernous transformation of the portal vein (left) having reversed flow in the splenic vein (middle) and a large perisplenic collateral (right). Arrows indicate flow direction. P, pancreas; Co, confluens.

 
Continuous hepatofugal flow in branches of the portal vein is a specific sign for portal hypertension [16]. Portosystemic collateral blood vessels develop from pre-existing small portal vessels and may lead to portosystemic shunting [14]. Depending on collateral size and amount of blood drainage from the portal venous system, hepatofugal portal venous flow may be found in the portal venous trunk, sections of the portal venous systems or only in small portal venous branches, e.g. left gastric vein (Figure 20Go, Figure 21Go) [19].



View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 20. Colour Doppler ultrasound in a patient with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension and reversed flow in the left gastric vein (VCV). VP, portal vein.

 


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 21. Colour Doppler ultrasound of the spleen in a patient with liver cirrhosis. Trans-splenic vessels were seen (middle) with a hepatofugal venous flow (right). Arrows indicate flow direction.

 
A stagnant or venous "0" flow may occur in cirrhotic patients. Very slow velocities (less than 2 cm s-1) cannot be detected because the Doppler signal is lower than the threshold of the equipment receiver [6] (Figure 22Go). Additional respiratory modulation can be observed (Figure 23Go). There is some evidence that ultrasound contrast enhancement is useful for assessment of blood flow direction with regard to the discrimination on stagnant or venous "0" flow [20].



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 22. Colour Doppler ultrasound of the portal vein in a patient with fatty liver cirrhosis and a "0" flow in the portal vein (VP).

 


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 23. Colour Doppler ultrasound in a patient with alcoholic fatty liver cirrhosis with a hepatopetal flow during expiration (left) an a venous "0" flow in the portal vein during inspiration (right).

 

    Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Physiological flow pattern
 Pathological flow patterns
 Conclusion
 References
 
Color Doppler ultrasound of the portal vein and its branches shows a wide spectrum of different flow patterns.

In patients with liver cirrhosis, assessment of the direction of portal flow is helpful for diagnosis of portal hypertension. Various other conditions, such as cardial and respiratory cycles, may influence portal venous flow.

Received for publication November 29, 2001. Revision received April 2, 2002. Accepted for publication May 9, 2002.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Physiological flow pattern
 Pathological flow patterns
 Conclusion
 References
 

  1. Drye JC. Intraperitoneal pressure in the human. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1948;87:72–9.
  2. Gallix BP, Taovrel P, Dauzat M, Bruel JM, Lafortune M. Flow pulsatility in the portal venous system: a study of Doppler sonography in healthy adults. AJR 1997;169:141–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Taylor KJW, Burns PN. Duplex Doppler scanning in the pelvis and abdomen. Ultrasound Med Biol 1985;11:643–58.[Medline]
  4. Duerinckx AJ, Grant EG, Perrella RR, et al. The pulsatile portal vein in cases of congestive heart failure: correlation of Duplex Doppler findings with right atrial pressures. Radiology 1990;176:655–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Hosoki T, Arisawa J, Marukawa T, et al. Portal blood flow in congestive heart failure pulsed duplex sonographic findings. Radiology 1990;174:733–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Rengo C, Brevetti G, Sorrentino G, D'Amato, et al. Portal vein pulsatility ratio provides a measure of right heart function in chronic heart failure. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998;24:327–32.[Medline]
  7. Abu-Yousef MM, Milani SG, Farmer RM. Pulsatile portal vein flow: a sign of tricuspid regurgitation on duplex Doppler sonography. AJR 1990;155:785–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Bezzi M, Mitchell DG, Needleman L, Goldberg BB. Iatronic aneurysmal portal-hepatic venous fistula diagnosed by color doppler imaging. J Ultrasound Med 1988;7:457–61.[Medline]
  9. Grant EG, Tessler FN, Gomes AS, et al. Color Doppler imaging of portosystemic shunts. AJR 1990;154:393–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Gorka TS, Gorka W. Doppler sonographic diagnosis of severe portal vein pulsatility in constrictive pericarditis: flow normalization after pericardiectomy. J Clin Ultrasound 1990;27:84–8.
  11. Denys AL, Abehsera M, Lelontre B, Sanvanet A. Intrahepatic hemodynamic changes following portal vein embolisation: a prospective Doppler study. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1703–7.[Medline]
  12. Wachsberg RM, Needleman L, Wilson DJ. Portal vein pulsatility in normal and cirrhotic adults without cardiac disease. J Clin Ultrasound 1995;23:3–15.[Medline]
  13. Dietrich CF, Lee JM, Gottschalk R, Herrmann G, et al. Hepatic and portal vein flow pattern in correlation with intrahepatic fat deposition and liver histology in patients with chronic hepatitis c. AJR 1998;171:437–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Gaiani S, Bolondi L, Li Bassi S, Zironi G, Siringo S, Barbara L. Prevalence of spontaneous hepatofugal portal flow in liver cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1991;100:160–7.[Medline]
  15. Blendis LM, Orrego H, Crossley IR, et al. The role of hepatocyte enlargement in hepatic pressure in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic alcoholic liver disease. Hepatology 1982;2:539–46.[Medline]
  16. Von Herbay A, Frieling T, Häussinger D. Color Doppler sonographic evaluation of spontaneous portosystemic shunts and inversion of portal venous flow in patients with cirrhosis. J Clin Ultrasound 2000;28:332–9.[Medline]
  17. Bolondi L, Gaiani S, Piscaglia F, Serra C. The portal venous system. In: Meire H, Cosgrove D, Dewbury Y, Farrant P, editors. Abdominal and general ultrasound. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2001:251–69.
  18. Herbetko J, Grigg AP, Buckley AR, Phillips GL. Venoocclusive liver disease after bone marrow transplantation: findings at duplex sonography. AJR 1992;158:1001–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Restrepo-Schäfer I, Wollenberg B, Riera-Knorrenschild J, Görg C. Partially reversed intrasplenic venous blood flow detected by color doppler sonography in two patients with hematologic diseases and splenomegaly. J Clin Ultrasound 2001;29:294–7.[Medline]
  20. Sidhu PS, Marshal MM, Ryan SM, Ellis SM. Clinical use of Levovist, an ultrasound contrast agent, in the imaging of liver transplantation: assessment of the pre- and post-transplant patient. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1114–26.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Görg, C
Right arrow Articles by Dietrich, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Görg, C
Right arrow Articles by Dietrich, J


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS