| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Short communication |
Departments of 1Radiology, 2Oncology and 3Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital and the University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Miles et al recently developed a single slice quantifiable CT technique using changes in attenuation within the aorta as an input function [2], a technique that has been used in the assessment of renal [3] and hepatic [4] perfusion. We have previously reported on the refinement of this technique to measure cerebral blood flow using venous drainage into the sagittal sinus as a surrogate input function [5], a methodology that is currently being used to assess acute stroke patients [6]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the robustness of the technique by assessing the day-to-day reproducibility of the methodology.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A maximum enhancement image was obtained for each pixel over serial slices, which generated a composite image that identified the principal arterial and venous structures. This technique uses previously defined pre-set time density limit curves for vessels (minimum -5 Hounsfield units (HU), maximum 400 HU). A region of interest was then drawn around the sagittal sinus and was used as the "input" function. The methodology is based on previous work of Leggett et al [7] where, using the indicator dyedilution theory, tissue perfusion is given by the formula:
|
|
A CT perfusion image was then obtained using an algorithm that excluded large vessels. This produced measures of absolute cerebral blood flow on a pixel-by-pixel basis for all the brain in the imaged slice. Regions of interest were drawn predominately in the middle cerebral artery territories and an average cerebral blood flow value was obtained for each region. The same region of interest was selected on the follow-up CT study and each composite region of interest was compared with that obtained on the second study, comparing the values obtained for the same hemisphere. Correlation coefficients and other analyses were calculated using SPSSTM (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The possible importance of this technique is the ability to use it on almost any modern CT machine without the need for specialist equipment. Even the intravenous pump is not essential, although it is desirable [4]. Conventional CT is less sensitive that MR in the demonstration of acute non-haemorrhagic stroke [10], although it is used in therapeutic trials for early stroke mainly owing to its generalized availability and implicit sensitivity to acute haemorrhage [11].
The demonstration of areas of abnormal cerebral blood flow using CT perfusion in patients with acute stroke who may have a normal conventional CT study could be of great diagnostic and therapeutic use. Although this is an area of tremendous progress in MR [12], the lack of widespread 24 h availability of MR precludes its generalized use in acute stroke. CT perfusion imaging is now being used in the routine assessment of acute stroke [13], and has been shown to be particularly valuable in the identification of reversible ischaemia [13]. The technique may prove to be an alternative, reliable and available diagnostic strategy in acute stroke, especially if used on machines capable of multislice imaging.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication October 10, 2000. Revision received January 24, 2001. Accepted for publication March 20, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. E. Latchaw, M. J. Alberts, M. H. Lev, J. J. Connors, R. E. Harbaugh, R. T. Higashida, R. Hobson, C. S. Kidwell, W. J. Koroshetz, V. Mathews, et al. Recommendations for Imaging of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): 3646 - 3678. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. V. Guadagno, P. S. Jones, F. I. Aigbirhio, D. Wang, T. D. Fryer, D. J. Day, N. Antoun, I. Nimmo-Smith, E. A. Warburton, and J. C. Baron Selective neuronal loss in rescued penumbra relates to initial hypoperfusion Brain, October 1, 2008; 131(10): 2666 - 2678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sabir, R. Schor-Bardach, C. J. Wilcox, S. Rahmanuddin, M. B. Atkins, J. B. Kruskal, S. Signoretti, V. D. Raptopoulos, and S. N. Goldberg Perfusion MDCT Enables Early Detection of Therapeutic Response to Antiangiogenic Therapy Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 133 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hakime, H. Peddi, A. U. Hines-Peralta, C. J. Wilcox, J. Kruskal, S. Lin, T. de Baere, V. D. Raptopoulos, and S. N. Goldberg CT Perfusion for Determination of Pharmacologically Mediated Blood Flow Changes in an Animal Tumor Model Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 712 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.C. Sanelli, G. Nicola, R. Johnson, A.J. Tsiouris, I. Ougorets, C. Knight, B. Frommer, S. Veronelli, and R.D. Zimmerman Effect of Training and Experience on Qualitative and Quantitative CT Perfusion Data AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 428 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Atri New Technologies and Directed Agents for Applications of Cancer Imaging J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2006; 24(20): 3299 - 3308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V Goh, S Halligan, L Gartner, P Bassett, and C I Bartram Quantitative colorectal cancer perfusion measurement by multidetector-row CT: does greater tumour coverage improve measurement reproducibility? Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2006; 79(943): 578 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Goh, S. Halligan, J.-A. Hugill, and C. I. Bartram Quantitative assessment of tissue perfusion using MDCT: comparison of colorectal cancer and skeletal muscle measurement reproducibility. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 164 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K D Hellier, J L Hampton, J V Guadagno, N P Higgins, N M Antoun, D J Day, J H Gillard, E A Warburton, and J-C Baron Perfusion CT helps decision making for thrombolysis when there is no clear time of onset. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2006; 77(3): 417 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Goh, S. Halligan, J.-A. Hugill, P. Bassett, and C. I. Bartram Quantitative Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Perfusion Using MDCT: Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 225 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-H. Jahng, E. Song, X.-P. Zhu, G. B. Matson, M. W. Weiner, and N. Schuff Human Brain: Reliability and Reproducibility of Pulsed Arterial Spin-labeling Perfusion MR Imaging Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 909 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Miller, H. H. Pien, D. Sahani, A. G. Sorensen, and J. H. Thrall Imaging Angiogenesis: Applications and Potential for Drug Development J Natl Cancer Inst, February 2, 2005; 97(3): 172 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rehman and G. C. Jayson Molecular Imaging of Antiangiogenic Agents Oncologist, February 1, 2005; 10(2): 92 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wintermark, N. J. Fischbein, W. S. Smith, N. U. Ko, M. Quist, and W. P. Dillon Accuracy of Dynamic Perfusion CT with Deconvolution in Detecting Acute Hemispheric Stroke AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2005; 26(1): 104 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wintermark, W. S. Smith, N. U. Ko, M. Quist, P. Schnyder, and W. P. Dillon Dynamic Perfusion CT: Optimizing the Temporal Resolution and Contrast Volume for Calculation of Perfusion CT Parameters in Stroke Patients AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2004; 25(5): 720 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K A Miles Perfusion CT for the assessment of tumour vascularity: which protocol? Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2003; 76(suppl_1): S36 - S42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K A Miles and M R Griffiths Perfusion CT: a worthwhile enhancement? Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2003; 76(904): 220 - 231. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Halligan Reproducibility, repeatability, correlation and measurement error Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2002; 75(890): 193 - 194. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J H Gillard, N M Antoun, N G Burnet, and J D Pickard Authors' reply Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2002; 75(890): 194 - 195. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |