First published online September 17, 2007
British Journal of Radiology (2007) 80, 902-910
© 2007 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/88577258
Imaging the neonate in the incubator: an investigation of the technical, radiological and nursing issues
S J Mutch, BSc(HONS), MSc, MIPEM
1 and
S D P Wentworth, BSc(HONS), PhD, MIPEM
2
1 Department of Medical Physics & Clinical Engineering, The Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7L J, 2 Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Rehabilitation Engineering Unit, Rookwood Hospital, Llandaff, Cardiff CF5 2YN, UK

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. General set-up for the incubator radiological imaging performance measurements. A fixed X-ray tube focus to phantom surface distance (FSD) of 90 cm was set for all incubators. Image quality was assessed for both imaging methods, namely with the image plate directly under the phantom (neonate) or when the plate is in the tray/slot mechanism.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Threshold detection index diagram showing the image quality results from exposing the plate by the direct method(plate under phantom/neonate) for each incubator.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Threshold detection index diagram showing the image quality results when the plate is exposed in the incubator tray/slot device for each incubator.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Threshold detection index diagram showing the average image quality from all incubators for each method of plate exposure.
|
|

View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7. Image artefact generated by a non-uniform mattress. Such materials must be carefully considered when using incubator X-ray trays for imaging.
|
|
Copyright © 2007 by the British Institute of Radiology.