This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Scott, H J Articles by Gale, A G Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Scott, H J Articles by Gale, A G

Breast screening: PERFORMS identifies key mammographic training needs

Applied Vision Research Centre, Loughborough University, Garendon Wing, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Participants: mean incorrectly reported case per type of mammographic feature.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. A matched design– subject characteristics. This relates to hundreds of screening cases per week.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Incorrectly reported cases by case classification.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Incorrectly reported cases by feature type and occupation. Spic: spiculated mass, AD: architectural distortion, Calc: calcification, IDM: ill defined mass, None: no features present, WDM: well defined mass, Asym: asymmetric density.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. Normal cases incorrectly reported and feature type.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 6. Benign incorrectly reported cases and feature type.

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 7. Malignant incorrectly reported cases by feature type.