BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online June 22, 2006
British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, 893-899
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/61874578

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, R
Right arrow Articles by Vieira, J W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, R
Right arrow Articles by Vieira, J W

Equivalent dose to organs and tissues in hysterosalpingography calculated with the FAX (Female Adult voXel) phantom

R Kramer, PhD 1 H J Khoury, PhD 1 C Lopes, PhD 1 and J W Vieira, PhD 2

1 Departamento de Energia Nuclear, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Avenida Prof. Luiz Freire, 100, Cidade Universitária, CEP 50740-540, Recife, PE, 2 Escola Politécnica, UPE, Recife, PE, Brazil


Figure 1
View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The FAX phantom: hysterosalpingography (HSG) exposure set-up for field = 24 cmx30 cm and FFD = 100 cm.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The EVA phantom: hysterosalpingography (HSG) exposure set-up for field = 24 cmx30 cm and FFD = 100 cm.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Conversion coefficient between equivalent dose to the ovaries and entrance surface air kerma as function of the tube voltage for field sizes of 18 cmx24 cm, and 24 cmx30 cm.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Conversion coefficient between equivalent dose to the uterus and entrance surface air kerma as function of the tube voltage for field sizes of 18 cmx24 cm, and 24 cmx30 cm.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Conversion coefficient between equivalent dose to the ovaries and entrance surface air kerma as function of the filtration for field sizes of 18 cmx24 cm, and 24 cmx30 cm.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Entrance surface air kerma per radiograph measured with a homogeneous PMMA phantom 19 cm thick as function of the tube voltage.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Ovarian and uterine equivalent dose per radiograph in hysterosalpingography(HSG) as function of the tube voltage.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Ratios between organ equivalent doses for posteroanterior(PA) and anteroposterior (AP) projection as a function of the tube voltage.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.