BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, 584-591
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/54853087

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamagami, T
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamagami, T
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, T

Prophylactic implantation of inferior vena cava filter during interventional radiological treatment for deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity

T Yamagami, MD, PhD, T Kato, MD, T Hirota, MD, R Yoshimatsu, MD, T Matsumoto, MD and T Nishimura, MD, PhD

Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-chyo, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan


Figure 1
Figure 1
View larger version (238K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A 19-year-old man (patient no. 6). (a) Venography shows venous thrombus distributing from the left common iliac vein to the left femoral vein (arrows). Note that Gunther tulip retrievable vena cava filter (GTF) was implanted at the inferior vena cava with an approach from the right jugular vein. (b) Venography obtained immediately after catheter-directed thrombolysis still shows that much of the thrombus remained. Note that multiple side holes of the catheter for catheter-directed thrombolysis were positioned in the segment of the thrombus (arrows). (c) Venocavography obtained from the right femoral vein shows that thrombus filling greater than the height of filter was captured in the filter (arrows). This image was obtained just after manual aspiration, mechanical thrombectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty were performed. These interventional radiological procedures were performed after catheter-directed thrombolysis, as shown in Figure 1a,bGo, and prolonged thrombolysis performed subsequently in the ward through the catheter with its tip positioned at the thrombosed segment. (d) Roentgenogram shows a temporary filter (arrow) (Neuhaus Protect, Toray) that was inserted at the cephalad level of GTF before GTF with thrombus was retrieved to be exchanged with a new GTF. (e) Venography through the right femoral vein, obtained after GTF was exchanged for a new one (arrow), shows no thrombus remaining in the inferior vena cava. The new GTF was implanted to continue treatment for the DVT, further avoiding the complication of pulmonary embolism. 7 days after this, metallic stent placement was performed, then venous thrombus resolved and rapid blood flow in the previously obstructed segment due to thrombus in the left common and external iliac and femoral vein was obtained.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.