BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, 504-509
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/33762931
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garipagaoglu, M
Right arrow Articles by Köseoglu, F G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garipagaoglu, M
Right arrow Articles by Köseoglu, F G

Changes in applicator positions and dose distribution between high dose rate brachytherapy fractions in cervix carcinoma patients receiving definitive radiotherapy

M Garipagaoglu, MD1, N Tunçel, PhD1, M G Dalmaz, MD1, H Gülkesen, MD2, A Toy, BSc1, A Ü Kizildag, BSc1 and F G Köseoglu, MD1

1 Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Departments of Radiation Oncology, 2 2Bioistatistics, Antalya, 07070 Turkey


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. The fixed points, which are pelvic bone reference points; the non-fixed points, namely left ovoid (LO), right ovoid (RO), tandem stopper (S), bladder (B) and rectal (Rg) reference points are shown on (a) anterior-posterior and (b) lateral diagram.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (7K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Simple scatter plot graphics of relationship between resultant vector and dose change in the rectum(r = –0.418, p = 0.007).

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.