This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jeffreys, M Articles by Davey Smith, G Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jeffreys, M Articles by Davey Smith, G

Initial experiences of using an automated volumetric measure of breast density: the standard mammogram form

¹ Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Private Box 756, Wellington, New Zealand, ² Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, ³ Mirada Solutions Ltd, Oxford, ⁴ Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, UK

View larger version (18K): [in a new window]   Figure 1. Distribution of the volume of dense breast tissue in 3816 mammograms.

View larger version (33K): [in a new window]   Figure 2. Relationship between total breast volume and standard mammogram form(SMF) volume/SMF% in 3816 mammograms.

View larger version (20K): [in a new window]   Figure 3. Bland-Altman plots showing agreement between left/right pairs of mammograms, 626 women. Note: Bland-Altman plots of the difference against the mean of left and right measures, with horizontal lines showing the mean difference of 0 and limits of agreement (±2 standard deviations). Both standard mammogram form (SMF) and SMF% have been log transformed for these analyses.