BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, 326-330
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/36530782
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hiorns, M P
Right arrow Articles by Marsden, P J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hiorns, M P
Right arrow Articles by Marsden, P J

A review of current local dose–area product levels for paediatric fluoroscopy in a tertiary referral centre compared with national standards. Why are they so different?

M P Hiorns, A Saini and P J Marsden

Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK


Figure 1
View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Case distribution of examinations in our institution. GI, gastrointestinal; MCU, micturating cystourethrography; FT, follow through; IVU, intravenous urogram; NJT, nasojejunal tube.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.