BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, 148-157
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/10206556

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hille, A
Right arrow Articles by Hess, C F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hille, A
Right arrow Articles by Hess, C F

A comparison of three-field and four-field techniques in different clinical target volumes in prostate cancer irradiation using dose volume histograms: a prospective three-dimensional analysis

A Hille, MD, N Töws and C F Hess, PhD, MD

Department of Radiotherapy, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Mean values, standard error and standard deviations(SD) for the rectum exposed to 40–70 Gy in irradiation of the prostate only with different treatment techniques.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Mean values, standard error and standard deviations(SD) for the rectum exposed to 40–70 Gy in irradiation of the prostate + proximal seminal vesicles with different treatment techniques.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Mean values, standard error and standard deviations(SD) for the volumes 50 Gy, 60 Gy and 65 Gy of the rectum in case of irradiation of the prostate + entire seminal vesicles with different treatment techniques.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.