BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, S41-S45
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/25058162
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roehrig, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roehrig, J

The manufacturer's perspective

J Roehrig, PhD

R2 Technology, Inc, 1195 W. Fremont Ave, Sunnyvale, CA 94087, USA



View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Radiologists alone detected 79% in the current year (left), of which computed-aided detection (CAD) marks 90%, or 71% of cases, and CAD marks 18% of the 21% that a single radiologist misses (middle). If the radiologist picks up all 18% of the additional actionable cases, the combined sensitivity of the radiologist with CAD would be 97% (right).

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.