BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, S31-S40
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/37646417

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alberdi, E
Right arrow Articles by Slack, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alberdi, E
Right arrow Articles by Slack, R

Use of computer-aided detection (CAD) tools in screening mammography: a multidisciplinary investigation

E Alberdi, PhD1, A A Povyakalo, PhD1, L Strigini, MEng1, P Ayton, PhD2, M Hartswood, PhD3, R Procter, PhD3 and R Slack, PhD3

1 Centre for Software Reliability and 2 Psychology Department, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB and 3 Institute for Communicating and Collaborative Systems School of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, 1 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, UK



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of correctness of computer-aided detection (CAD) output on case difficulty (rate of false negative errors). dp, prompted difficulty; d, unprompted difficulty; w, cancer that was wrongly processed by CAD; c, cancer that was correctly processed by CAD. ---, logistic regression curve for wrongly processed cancers; -·-·, logistic regression curve for correctly processed cancers; —, logistic regression curve for all cancers.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.