BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 543-547
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/73133162
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, C R
Right arrow Articles by Moloney, A J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, C R
Right arrow Articles by Moloney, A J

The low energy X-ray response of the LiF:Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosemeter: a comparison with LiF:Mg:Ti

C R Edwards, PhD, MIPEM1, P J Mountford, PhD, FIPEM1, S Green, PhD, FIPEM2, J E Palethorpe, HND, IIPEM2 and A J Moloney, BSc, MIPEM1

1 Medical Physics Directorate, University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Princes Road, Hartshill, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST4 7LN and 2 RRPPS, University Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. The relative response per unit air kerma to low energy quasi-monoenergetic X-rays of LiF:Mg:Cu:P and LiF:Mg:Ti thermoluminescent dosemeters normalized to that produced by 6 MV X-rays (error bars are ±1 standard deviation).

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.