BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 130-134
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/50195548

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, M
Right arrow Articles by Warren-Forward, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, M
Right arrow Articles by Warren-Forward, H

Dose implications of fluoroscopy-guided positioning (FGP) for lumbar spine examinations prior to acquiring plain film radiographs

M Saunders, BMRS A Budden, BMRS F MacIver, BMRS M Teunis, BMRS and H Warren-Forward, BSc, PhD

Medical Radiation Science, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia



View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Double histogram of dose–area product (DAP) values for conventional film–screen radiography (FSR) and fluoroscopy guided positioning (FGP). The best line of fit shows that the peak for FGP (solid line) is higher and to the left (lower dose) of the peak of the FSR (dotted line).

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Median dose–area product (DAP) value for each study site. Sites A–D used the conventional film–screen (FSR) technique; sites (E–G) used the fluoroscopy-guided positioning (FGP) technique. The median value for each technique has also been included.

 


View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. The median screening times illustrated in (a) correlate with the use of freeze-frame in site G, which displays the lowest median screening time of the three units. There is excellent correlation between median screening time and median dose–area product (DAP) values (b), indicating the importance of minimizing screening time.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.