British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 34-38
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/79694026
Radiation risk and cost-benefit analysis of a paediatric radiology procedure: results from a national study
H B L Pettersson, PhD1,
K Fälth-Magnusson, MD, PhD2,
J Persliden, PhD1,3 and
M Scott, PhD4
1 Department of Radiation Physics, IMV and 2 Department of Paediatrics, IMK, Faculty of Health Science, University of Linköping, S-581 85 Linköping, Sweden, 3 Department of Medical Physics, Örebro University Hospital, S-701 85 Örebro, Sweden and 4 Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QW, UK

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Frequency distribution of absorbed doses.
|
|

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Frequency distributions of absorbed doses with sedation technique as parameter.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Frequency distribution of absorbed doses for X-ray equipment with and without image memory (only parenteral sedation cases shown).
|
|

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Frequency distribution of fluoroscopy times with biopsy device as parameter.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. The departmental mean fluoroscopy time (±1 standard deviation) as a function of the number of annually performed biopsies (only parenteral sedation cases shown).
|
|
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.