BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 1040-1041
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/76963558
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Özdemir, D
Right arrow Articles by Polat, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Özdemir, D
Right arrow Articles by Polat, S

Lipiodol UF retention in dental sialography

D Özdemir, DDS1, N T Polat, DDS, PhD1 and S Polat, DDS, PhD2

1 Department of Prosthodontics and 2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Dentistry, 58140, Sivas, Turkey



View larger version (132K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Periapical radiography taken 39 months post sialography (before root canal filling replacement).

 


View larger version (94K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Dental pantomograph (DPT) taken 39 months post sialography.

 


View larger version (156K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. CT taken 59 months post sialography.

 


View larger version (91K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 4. Dental pantomography (DPT) taken 70 months post sialography.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.