BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 765-767
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/47388747

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armpilia, C I
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armpilia, C I
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B

Determination of the optimum dose per fraction in fractionated radiotherapy when there is delayed onset of tumour repopulation during treatment

C I Armpilia, MSc 1 R G Dale, PhD, , FIPEM 1 and B Jones, MD, , FRCR 2

1 Radiation Physics and Radiobiology, Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust/Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital, London W6 8RF and 2 Clinical Oncology, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0HS, UK



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The relationship between optimum dose per fraction and K factor (biological dose per day required to compensate for ongoing tumour cell repopulation). The cases for which the time after the start of treatment at which proliferation begins (Tdelay)=0 may be derived via Equation (8)Go. Cases for which Tdelay is non-zero muct be derived using the re-iterative method discussed in this article.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The relationship between tumour biologically effective dose (BED) and K factor (biological dose per day required to compensate for ongoing tumour cell repopulation).

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Schematic showing how the dose required for a given tumour cell kill increases with prolongation of treatment time. The rise in the curves is a direct result of the repopulation that occurs during treatment. The "dog-leg" pattern of change is assumed for the purpose of the calculations in this article. The more plausible "continuous" pattern of change is shown for comparison. Tdelay, the time after the start of treatment at which proliferation begins.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.