BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 426-432
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/91138314

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warren-Forward, H M
Right arrow Articles by Duggan, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warren-Forward, H M
Right arrow Articles by Duggan, L

Towards in vivo TLD dosimetry in mammography

H M Warren-Forward, BSc (Hons), PhD1 and L Duggan, BSc (Hons), PhD2

1 University of Newcastle, School of Health Sciences (Medical Radiation Science), Callaghan NSW 2308 and 2 Newcastle Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Waratah NSW 2298, Australia



View larger version (45K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Comparison of visibility of GR-200F (4 thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs)) and GR-200A (5 TLDs) on 5 cm of RMI 457 solid water imaged at a potential of 26 kVp.

 


View larger version (190K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Demonstration of digital subtraction of GR-200A and GR-200F. The GR-200A chip is clearly visible on both (a) the pre-and (b) the post-subtraction images. This is in contrast with the GR-200F chip which is not visible on (c) the pre-subtraction image and only just visible on (d) the post-subtraction image.

 


View larger version (75K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Mammography image of the volunteer mammogram. GR-200F is not visible on the image.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.