BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 420-425
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/27832269

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hohenstein, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hohenstein, P

X-ray imaging for palaeontology

P Hohenstein

Bundenbachfossilien, D-64686 Lautertal, Germany



View larger version (43K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Starfish Palasterina follmanni (a) X-ray/(b) surface picture; this fossil contains only a trivial amount of pyrite and absorbs few X-rays (a). The preparation shows more detail very clearly (b).

 


View larger version (57K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Starfish Loriolaster mirabilis (a) surface picture of the unprepared plate/(b) X-ray; here the X-ray shows the details of the skeleton; even the delicate webbing is easily distinguished.

 


View larger version (57K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Trilobite Chotecops sp; (a) in the un-X-rayed plate merely the head of the Trilobite and the apparently insignificant remainder can be assumed (see the surface picture). (b) The X-ray then, however, shows a complete animal with all body parts, excellently preserved and of rare pricelessness.

 


View larger version (71K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Starfish Taeniaster beneckei with the arthropod Mimetaster hexagonalis (a) X-ray/(b) surface picture; the fine-limbed unusual arthropod would not have been found but for X-rays. The plate was only 3–4 mm thick, but gave no indication of what lay beneath.

 


View larger version (75K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Three starfish Taeniaster beneckei: (a) surface picture of the partly prepared plate; (b) X-ray. The huge starfish overlaying another would not have been found without X-rays. The plate is about 8 mm thick and on the surface there is no hint of either fossil.

 


View larger version (61K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Starfish Taeniaster beneckei (a) X-ray/(b) surface picture; one of the best preserved examples of its kind.

 


View larger version (68K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Trilobite Chotecops sp. (X-ray); the body construction, as well as the numerous well-preserved small legs, are easily distinguished.

 


View larger version (124K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Crinoid Parisangulocrinus schmidti (surface picture); the crown is broadened out and shows the digestive tract next to the filigreed brachiolae; a second animal is partially hidden.

 


View larger version (55K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Crinoid Codiacrinus schultzei (X-ray), extraordinarily well preserved. A preparation of this lovely creature is unfortunately impossible because of the glassy hardness of the surrounding sediment rock.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.