BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 236-242
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/13096559

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cash, C J C
Right arrow Articles by Prager, R W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cash, C J C
Right arrow Articles by Prager, R W

Two- and three-dimensional ultrasound in the development of a needle-free injection system

C J C Cash, MCRP, FRCR 1 L H Berman, MRCP, FRCR 1 G M Treece, BA, PhD 2 A H Gee, BA, PhD 2 and R W Prager, BA, PhD 2

1 University Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ and the 2 Cambridge University Department of Engineering, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, UK



View larger version (112K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. In vitro specimen-intradermal injection: white arrowheads outline the acoustic arc; black arrow points to the dermal–subdermal junction.

 


View larger version (119K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. In vitro-intradermal injection. Diameter of the injectate is approximately 9 mm.

 


View larger version (121K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. In vitro specimen-subcutaneous injection. White arrowheads outline the acoustic arc; black arrow points to the dermal–subdermal junction.

 


View larger version (122K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. In vitro-subcutaneous injection. Diameter of the injectate is approximately 7 mm.

 


View larger version (121K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. In vivo intradermal injection demonstrating air within the dermis.

 


View larger version (130K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Swelling of the dermis from an intradermal injection. Arrow points to dermal–subdermal junction.

 


View larger version (121K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Intradermal injection. Small poorly reflective pockets (arrows) suggest some injectate is reaching the subcutaneous tissues.

 


View larger version (126K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. A subcutaneous injection illustrating some of the injectate in the dermis, seen as a moderately reflective swelling (black arrow), and some of the injectate in the subcutaneous tissues, seen as poorly reflective pockets (white arrowheads). White arrow points to the dermal–subdermal junction.

 


View larger version (87K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Manual segmentation of (a) the dermal swelling and (b) dermis alone from the same B-scan. A series of segmented B-scans is shown in 3D space (c) dermal swelling, (d) dermis alone. (e) Surface rendered dermal swelling and (f) surface rendered dermis alone are produced from the segmented B-scans, illustrating the change in dermal volume that occurs following an injection.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.