BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Radiology (2003) 76, 57-61
© 2003 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/68918327
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brealey, S
Right arrow Articles by Ethell, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brealey, S
Right arrow Articles by Ethell, S

Accident and Emergency and General Practitioner plain radiograph reporting by radiographers and radiologists: a quasi-randomized controlled trial

S Brealey, BSc1, D G King, MBChB, FRCS(Eng), FRCR2, M T I Crowe, MRCP, FRCR3, I Crawshaw, DCR, MSc2, L Ford, DCR, MSc2, N G Warnock, MRCP, FRCR2, R A J Mannion, MRCP, FRCR2 and S Ethell, BSc4

1 Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO1 5DD, 2 X-ray Department, York District Hospital, Wiggington Road, York YO30 8HE, 3 X-ray Department, King's Lynn and Wisbech Hospitals NHS Trust, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gayton Road, Norfolk PE30 4ET, and 4 Department of Radiography and Imaging Sciences, St Martin's College, Bowerham Road, Lancaster LA1 3JD, UK



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic curve comparing clinical specialist radiographer (CSR) A and CSR B for the control group. TPR, true positive rate; FPR, false positive rate.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Receiver operating characteristic curve comparing clinical specialist radiographers (CSRs) and radiologists for the control group. TPR, true positive rate; FPR, false positive rate.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Receiver operating characteristic curve comparing clinical specialist radiographer (CSR) A and CSR B for group E1. TPR, true positive rate; FPR, false positive rate.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 4. Receiver operating characteristic curve comparing clinical specialist radiographers (CSRs) and radiologists for group E1. TPR, true positive rate; FPR, false positive rate.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 5. Receiver operating characteristic curve comparing clinical specialist radiographer (CSR) A and CSR B for group E2. TPR, true positive rate; FPR, false positive rate.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 6. Receiver operating characteristic curve comparing clinical specialist radiographers (CSRs) and radiologists for group E2. TPR, true positive rate; FPR, false positive rate.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 7. Receiver operating characteristic curve comparing clinical specialist radiographer (CSR) A and CSR B for group E3. TPR, true positive rate; FPR, false positive rate.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 8. Receiver operating characteristic curve comparing clinical specialist radiographers (CSRs) and radiologists for group E3. TPR, true positive rate; FPR, false positive rate.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2003 by the British Institute of Radiology.