BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, J C
Right arrow Articles by Nixon, T E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evans, J C
Right arrow Articles by Nixon, T E

A national survey of attitudes towards the use of MRI in patients known to have intracranial aneurysm clips

J C Evans, MRCP, FRCR E T Smith, FRCR and T E Nixon, FRCR

Department of Neuroradiology, The Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool L9 7LJ, UK



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Association between the strength of the magnet and the decision to perform MRI on patients with intracerebral aneurysm clips. {square}, no; {blacksquare}, yes.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Regional boundaries used in Figure 3Go. The numbers indicate those centres that responded in each region. Scot, Scotland; NI, Northern Ireland; NW, north-west England; NE, north-east England; Mid, Midlands; East, eastern England; South, southern England; L, London.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. The number of centres in each region that would ({blacksquare}) or would not ({square}) perform MRI on patients with intracranial aneurysm clips. See Figure 2Go for definition of regional boundaries.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2001 by the British Institute of Radiology.