BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Osei, E K
Right arrow Articles by Kotre, C J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Osei, E K
Right arrow Articles by Kotre, C J

Equivalent dose to the fetus from occupational exposure of pregnant staff in diagnostic radiology

E K Osei, MSc, PhD 1 and C J Kotre, MSc, PhD 2

1Princess Margaret Hospital, Department of Clinical Physics, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada and 2Regional Medical Physics Department, Newcastle General Hospital, Westgate Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 6BE, UK



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. (a) Schematic presentation of a simplified model of irradiation of staff (particularly the staff geometry) used in the Monte Carlo simulation. The outer block represents the trunk of an adult member of staff and the inner block represents the uterus. (b) Schematic presentation of the geometry used in the experimental validation of the Monte Carlo code.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Comparison of normalized equivalent dose to the uterus for scattered irradiation generated at different tube potentials (kVp). {square}, experimental data; {blacksquare}, Monte Carlo data.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Comparison of experimentally measured data ({square}) with Monte Carlo calculated data ({blacksquare}) for primary irradiation and when the phantom is covered with 0.25 mm lead, for 90 kVp (top), 80 kVp (middle) and 70 kVp (bottom). Equivalent dose to the uterus nomalized to thermoluminescent dosemeter readings when placed (A) under and (B) over the lead apron.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2001 by the British Institute of Radiology.