BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mittal, T K
Right arrow Articles by Wood, A M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mittal, T K
Right arrow Articles by Wood, A M

Renal arteriography using gadolinium enhanced 3D MR angiography—clinical experience with the technique, its limitations and pitfalls

T K Mittal, MD, FRCR1, C Evans, FRCR2, T Perkins, BSc2 and A M Wood, MRCP, FRCR2

1Department of Radiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK and 2Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XW, UK



View larger version (141K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Coronal maximum intensity projection magnetic resonance angiography image in a potential renal donor demonstrating an accessory artery on the upper pole of the right kidney.

 


View larger version (84K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Potential renal donor with abnormal vascular network and collateral vessels demonstrated on digital subtraction angiography (a), but not completely visualized on magnetic resonance angiography (b).

 


View larger version (102K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. (a) Magnetic resonance angiography demonstrating Grade 2 stenosis in the proximal left renal artery, which corresponds well with the digital subtraction angiography (b).

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2001 by the British Institute of Radiology.