BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online June 22, 2009
British Journal of Radiology (2010) 83, 28-34
© 2010 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/38829806

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ko, S-M
Right arrow Articles by Choi, N-M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ko, S-M
Right arrow Articles by Choi, N-M

Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion with 64-slice multidetector CT: a comparison with two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography

S-M Ko, MD Y-J Kim, MD J-H Park, MD and N-M Choi, MD

Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence: Sung-Min Ko, Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 4-12 Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 143-729, Korea. E-mail: ksm9723{at}yahoo.co.kr

The aim of this study was to compare the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and regional wall motion using 64-slice multidetector CT (MDCT) with that using two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2D-TTE) in a heterogeneous patient population. In 126 patients with angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction, chronic myocardial infarction, atypical chest pain without coronary artery disease or valvular heart disease, 64-slice MDCT was performed using retrospective electrocardiography gating without dose modulation. 20 phases of the cardiac cycle were analysed to identify the end-diastolic and end-systolic phases and to assess regional LV wall motion. For these measurements, 2D-TTE served as the reference standard. MDCT and 2D-TTE were performed within 10 days of each other. An excellent correlation between MDCT and 2D-TTE was shown for the evaluation of LVEF (59.2±11% vs 57.9±10%, respectively; r _ 0.87). LVEF was slightly overestimated by MDCT, when compared with 2D-TTE, by an average of 1.4±5.6%. Good agreement was obtained between the use of the two techniques, with 94% of the segments scored identically on both modalities ({kappa} _ 0.70). MDCT had a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 82% when compared with 2D-TTE as the reference standard. In conclusion, the use of 64-slice MDCT can provide comparable results to those using 2D-TTE for LVEF and regional wall motion assessment in a heterogeneous population.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2010 by the British Institute of Radiology.