BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online March 30, 2009
British Journal of Radiology (2009) 82, 946-949
© 2009 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/73200201

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CARSON, K J
Right arrow Articles by HOUNSELL, A R
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CARSON, K J
Right arrow Articles by HOUNSELL, A R

Personnel radiation dose considerations in the use of an integrated PET–CT scanner for radiotherapy treatment planning

K J CARSON, PhD 1 V A L YOUNG, DCR 2 V P COSGROVE, PhD 3 P H JARRITT, PhD 1 and A R HOUNSELL, PhD 3

1 Medical Physics Agency, Royal Group of Hospitals, Grosvenor Road, and 2 Radiation Oncology and 3 Medical Physics Agency, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast

Correspondence: Kathryn Carson, Nuclear Medicine Department, Level 1, Imaging Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK. E-mail: kathryn.carson{at}mpa.n-i.nhs.uk

The acquisition of radiotherapy planning scans on positron emission tomography (PET)–CT scanners requires the involvement of radiotherapy radiographers. This study assessed the radiation dose received by these radiographers during this process. Radiotherapy planning 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET–CT scans were acquired for 28 non-small cell lung cancer patients. In order to minimise the radiation dose received, a two-stage process was used in which the most time-consuming part of the set-up was performed before the patient received their 18F-FDG injection. Throughout this process, the radiographers wore electronic personal dosemeters and recorded the doses received at different stages of the process. The mean total radiation dose received by a radiotherapy radiographer was 5.1±2.6 µSv per patient. The use of the two-stage process reduced the time spent in close proximity to the patient by approximately a factor of four. The two-stage process was effective in keeping radiation dose to a minimum. The use of a pre-injection set-up session reduces the radiation dose to the radiotherapy radiographers because of their involvement in PET–CT radiotherapy treatment planning scans by approximately a factor of three.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.