BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
First published online May 26, 2009
British Journal of Radiology (2009) 82, 936-940
© 2009 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/50204374
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TUNCEL, N
Right arrow Articles by TOY, A
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TUNCEL, N
Right arrow Articles by TOY, A

Optimisation techniques in vaginal cuff brachytherapy

N TUNCEL, PhD M GARIPAGAOGLU, MD A U KIZILDAG, MSc F ANDIC, MD and A TOY, MSc

Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, 07059 Antalya, Turkey

Correspondence: Melahat Garipagaoglu, Acibadem Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Enstitusu, Kozyatagi Hastanesi, Inonu Cad. Okur Sok No 20, 34742 Kozyatagi, Istanbul. E-mail: melahat.garipagaoglu{at}gmail.com

The aim of this study was to explore whether an in-house dosimetry protocol and optimisation method are able to produce a homogeneous dose distribution in the target volume, and how often optimisation is required in vaginal cuff brachytherapy. Treatment planning was carried out for 109 fractions in 33 patients who underwent high dose rate iridium-192 (Ir192) brachytherapy using Fletcher ovoids. Dose prescription and normalisation were performed to catheter-oriented lateral dose points (dps) within a range of 90–110% of the prescribed dose. The in-house vaginal apex point (Vk), alternative vaginal apex point (Vk'), International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) rectal point (Rg) and bladder point (Bl) doses were calculated. Time–position optimisations were made considering dps, Vk and Rg doses. Keeping the Vk dose higher than 95% and the Rg dose less than 85% of the prescribed dose was intended. Target dose homogeneity, optimisation frequency and the relationship between prescribed dose, Vk, Vk', Rg and ovoid diameter were investigated. The mean target dose was 99±7.4% of the prescription dose. Optimisation was required in 92 out of 109 (83%) fractions. Ovoid diameter had a significant effect on Rg (p = 0.002), Vk (p = 0.018), Vk' (p = 0.034), minimum dps (p = 0.021) and maximum dps (p<0.001). Rg, Vk and Vk' doses with 2.5 cm diameter ovoids were significantly higher than with 2 cm and 1.5 cm ovoids. Catheter-oriented dose point normalisation provided a homogeneous dose distribution with a 99±7.4% mean dose within the target volume, requiring time–position optimisation.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.