BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
First published online March 16, 2009
British Journal of Radiology (2009) 82, 855-859
© 2009 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/37579222
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROXBY, P
Right arrow Articles by CRAMB, J
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ROXBY, P
Right arrow Articles by CRAMB, J

Simple methods to reduce patient dose in a Varian cone beam CT system for delivery verification in pelvic radiotherapy

P ROXBY, MSc 1 T KRON, PhD 1,2 F FOROUDI, MD 3 A HAWORTH, PhD 1,2 C FOX, PhD 1 A MULLEN, MSc 1 and J CRAMB, MSc 1

1 Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Physical Sciences, St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, 2 RMIT University, Department of Applied Physics, Melbourne, 3 Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia

Correspondence: Tomas Kron, PhD, Principal Research Physicist, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Physical Sciences, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett St, Victoria 8006, Australia. E-mail: Tomas.Kron{at}petermac.org

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a three-dimensional imaging modality that has recently become available on linear accelerators for radiotherapy patient position verification. It was the aim of the present study to implement simple strategies for reduction of the dose delivered in a commercial CBCT system. The dose delivered in a CBCT procedure (Varian, half-fan acquisition, 650 projections, 125 kVp) was assessed using a cylindrical Perspex phantom (diameter, 32 cm) with a calibrated Farmer type ionisation chamber. A copper filter (thickness, 0.15 mm) was introduced increasing the half value layer of the beam from 5.5 mm Al to 8 mm Al. Image quality and noise were assessed using an image quality phantom (CatPhan) while the exposure settings per projection were varied from 25 ms/80 mA to 2 ms/2 mA per projection. Using the copper filter reduced the dose to the phantom from approximately 45 mGy to 30 mGy at standard settings (centre/periphery weighting 1/3 to 2/3). Multiple CBCT images were acquired for six patients with pelvic malignancies to compare CBCTs with and without a copper filter. Although the reconstructed image is somewhat noisier with the filter, it features similar contrast in the centre of the patient and was often preferred by the radiation oncologist because of greater image uniformity. The X-ray shutters were adjusted to the minimum size required to obtain the desired image volume for a given patient diameter. The simple methods described here reduce the effective dose to patients undergoing daily CBCT and are easy to implement, and initial evidence suggests that they do not affect the ability to identify soft tissue for the purpose of treatment verification.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.