BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
First published online March 2, 2009
British Journal of Radiology (2009) 82, 595-599
© 2009 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/96865511
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CASTRO PENA, P
Right arrow Articles by FOURQUET, A
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CASTRO PENA, P
Right arrow Articles by FOURQUET, A
British Journal of Radiology 82 (2009),595-599 ©2009 The British Institute of Radiology

Anatomical, clinical and radiological delineation of target volumes in breast cancer radiotherapy planning: individual variability, questions and answers

P CASTRO PENA, MD Y M KIROVA, MD F CAMPANA, MD R DENDALE, MD M A BOLLET, MD N FOURNIER-BIDOZ, PhD and A FOURQUET, MD

Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France

Correspondence: Youlia Kirova, Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France. E-mail: youlia.kirova{at}curie.net

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the individual variability of anatomical and radiological delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy (RT) in preparation for new techniques and to propose practical solutions to improve delineation in everyday practice. In the first phase, a patient with stage T3N3M0 breast cancer and complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was assessed by CT scan in the treatment position before RT. 11 radiation oncologists (5 breast cancer specialists and 6 residents) independently delineated the breast and lymph node (LN) regions before definition of target volumes. Organs at risk (heart, lung, thyroid and brachial plexus) were also delineated. All regions (breast, axilla, supraclavicular LN, infraclavicular LN and internal mammary chain) were delineated and compared in terms of volume. Comparative analysis was performed with Aquilab software. Differences in the clinical and radiological assessment were observed between the various radiation oncologists. Simplified rules of delineation were developed in the department. Using these rules, the second patient's CT was delineated by the same physicians and better results were observed. Simplified rules of delineation were developed. In conclusion, major differences in anatomical and radiological delineation for breast cancer RT were observed among the physicians. This study led to the development of written delineation protocols. The study is ongoing with evaluation of the dosimetric impact and definition of different target volumes.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.