BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online December 19, 2008
British Journal of Radiology (2009) 82, 482-485
© 2009 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/31522537

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COBBEN, L P
Right arrow Articles by BLICKMAN, J G
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by COBBEN, L P
Right arrow Articles by BLICKMAN, J G
British Journal of Radiology 82 (2009),482-485 ©2009 The British Institute of Radiology

Imaging of patients with clinically suspected appendicitis in the Netherlands: conclusions of a survey

L P COBBEN, MD 1 O J BAKKER, MD 2 J B PUYLAERT, MD, PhD 1 L M KINGMA, MD, PhD 1 and J G BLICKMAN, MD, PhD 3

1 Department of Radiology, Medisch Centrum Haaglanden, Lijnbaan 32, 2501 CK Den Haag, The Netherlands, 2 Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands, and 3 Department of Radiology, Universitair Medisch Centrum St Radboud, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Correspondence: Lodewijk P Cobben, Department of Radiology, Medisch Centrum Haaglanden, Lijnbaan 32, 2501 CK Den Haag, The Netherlands. E-mail: coblod{at}tiscali.nl

The aim of this study was to summarize the extent of variation in imaging strategies in patients clinically suspected of having appendicitis. By means of a written survey, the policies for the imaging management of patients clinically suspected of having appendicitis in the Netherlands were inventoried. A questionnaire was sent to the departments of surgery and radiology of all 105 Dutch hospitals, including the 8 academic medical centres, in March 2006. Questionnaires were returned from 98 hospitals. It was found that, in the work-up of patients suspected of having appendicitis, ultrasound or CT was performed in a minority of hospitals for 50% or more of these patients. In the majority of hospitals, it was carried out for less than 50% of these patients. There is a widespread variability in pre-operative imaging regardless of hospital type. This survey shows that, despite the ubiquitous presence of ultrasound and CT in Dutch hospitals, the pre-operative imaging work-up in patients clinically suspected of having acute appendicitis does not reflect this, being performed in only a minority of patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Radiologists and surgeons alike should be aware of the positive impact of adjunctive imaging in this group of patients — most importantly lowering the negative appendicectomy rate and also lowering total hospital costs.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.