BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2009) 82, e85-e86
© 2009 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/40671180

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JEGANNATHEN, A
Right arrow Articles by LOGUE, J P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JEGANNATHEN, A
Right arrow Articles by LOGUE, J P
British Journal of Radiology 82 (2009),e85-e86 ©2009 The British Institute of Radiology

Testicular seminoma with mediastinal lymphadenopathy — a diagnostic pitfall

A JEGANNATHEN, MRCP 1 M B TAYLOR, FRCR 2 M JONES, FRCS 3 and J P LOGUE, MRCP, FRCR 1

Departments of 1 Clinical Oncology and, 2 Radiology, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and 3 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Wythenshawe hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK

Correspondence: J P Logue, Consultant Clinical Oncologist, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK. E-mail: john.logue{at}christie.nhs.uk

Relapse following adjuvant paraaortic radiation therapy in patients with Stage I seminoma is rare, occurring in approximately 4% of men. The majority of relapses are sited in the pelvis but relapse in the mediastinum is also recognised. As such, radiological imaging using chest radiographs remains commonplace in follow-up. However, there are reports of the association of testicular cancers with sarcoidosis and sarcoid-like processes in the mediastinum, emphasising the importance of making histological diagnosis prior to commencement of any treatment. We report on two men treated for testicular seminoma who on follow-up developed mediastinal lymphadenopathy, which was initially assumed to be metastatic seminoma. Both patients underwent mediastinascopy and biopsy prior to commencement of anti-cancer therapy. In both cases, the biopsies showed sarcoidosis, and unnecessary anti-cancer treatment was avoided.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.