BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online December 19, 2008
British Journal of Radiology (2009) 82, 371-373
© 2009 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/32471003

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LOKE, S C
Right arrow Articles by GOH, J P N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LOKE, S C
Right arrow Articles by GOH, J P N
British Journal of Radiology 82 (2009),371-373 ©2009 The British Institute of Radiology

Incidence of semicircular canal dehiscence in Singapore

S C LOKE, MBChB, FRCR and J P N GOH, MBBS, FRCR

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore

Correspondence: SC Loke, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore 308433. E-mail: siuloke{at}hotmail.com

Semicircular canal dehiscence is a congenital syndrome that mainly affects the superior and, less commonly, the posterior semicircular canals. The diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome depends on the demonstration of a very small defect in the bony wall of the superior semicircular canal. Any amount of intact bone present excludes the diagnosis. The study will give an approximation of the incidence of semicircular canal dehiscence in Singapore. No specific data regarding the number of such cases exist currently. Retrospective review of CT scans of the temporal bone performed at our institution between January 2005 and July 2007 revealed a total of 10 such cases over this period, comprising 8 males and 2 females, with all cases involving the superior semicircular canal. Almost all of the patients scanned had evidence of previous or existing cholesteatoma. Three patients had bilateral superior semicircular canal dehiscence (all males), with an almost equal number of semicircular canal dehiscence on both sides for both sexes. Our study shows no significant advantage to obtaining reformatted oblique sagittal images for all temporal bone studies, unless the visualized walls show questionable defects. In these cases, reconstructed images are probably advantageous and should be obtained and reviewed.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.