BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online December 8, 2008
British Journal of Radiology (2009) 82, 328-331
© 2009 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/13535955

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by YODA, K
Right arrow Articles by PELLEGRINI, R G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by YODA, K
Right arrow Articles by PELLEGRINI, R G
British Journal of Radiology 82 (2009),328-331 ©2009 The British Institute of Radiology

Dose verification of intensity-modulated arc therapy using an ERGO++ treatment planning system and Elekta internal multileaf collimators for prostate cancer treatment

K YODA, PhD 1,2 K NAKAGAWA, MD, PhD 1 K SHIRAISHI, MD, PhD 1 Y OKANO, RTT 1 K OHTOMO, MD, PhD 1 and R G PELLEGRINI, PhD 2

1 Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, 2 Elekta, 3D Line Research & Development, Milan, Italy

Correspondence: Kiyoshi Yoda, Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan. E-mail: kyoda{at}m.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Dose verification of intensity-modulated arc therapy using an ERGO++ treatment planning system and Elekta internal multileaf collimators is described. Prostate intensity-modulated arc therapy was planned using the arc modulation optimization algorithm inverse planning module of ERGO++. After transferring the plan to Elekta Synergy's controller (Elekta Ltd, Crawley, UK), the isocentre dose was measured and compared with a calculated dose using a pinpoint chamber and a water phantom in a cylindrical acrylic enclosure. Subsequently, an EDR2 film was placed inside a multilayer plastic phantom, and total dose distributions were measured in three axial planes as well as in the coronal and sagittal planes to compare the actual dose with the calculated dose. The dose discrepancy at the isocentre was 1.7%. The calculated gamma indices were less than 1 over 90% of the three axial planes, as well as in the coronal and sagittal planes, having a dose greater than 50% of the maximum target dose.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.