BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2009) 82, 28-34
© 2009 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/43911400

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NIWA, T
Right arrow Articles by INOUE, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NIWA, T
Right arrow Articles by INOUE, T
British Journal of Radiology 82 (2009),28-34 ©2009 The British Institute of Radiology

Advanced pancreatic cancer: the use of the apparent diffusion coefficient to predict response to chemotherapy

T NIWA, MD 1 M UENO, MD 2 S OHKAWA, MD 2 T YOSHIDA, MD 1 T DOIUCHI, MD 1 K ITO, MD 1 and T INOUE, MD 3

Departments of 1 Radiology and, 2 Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Centre, 1-1-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, 241-0815 and 3 Department of Radiology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan

Correspondence: Tetsu Niwa, Department of Radiology, Kanagawa Children's Medical Centre, 2-138-4 Mutsukawa, Minami-ku, Yokohama, 232-8555, Japan. E-mail: tniwa{at}kcmc.jp

The purpose of this study was to determine if the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on diffusion-weighted MRI could predict the response of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer to chemotherapy. Diffusion-weighted MRI was performed in 63 consecutive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who were subsequently treated with chemotherapy. The ADC values of the primary tumour with a middle b-value (400 s mm–2) and a high b-value (1000 s mm–2) were determined; cystic or necrotic components were avoided. The patients were classified into two groups: (i) those with progressive disease and (ii) those who were stable 3 months and 6 months after initial treatment. The groups were compared with respect to the ADC and clinical factors, including gender, age, Union International Contre le Cancer (UICC ) stage, initial tumour size and chemotherapy agents used. Local tumour progression rates were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The middle b-value ADC of the pancreatic cancers ranged from 0.93–2.42 x10–3 mm2 s–1 (mean, 1.50 x10–3 mm2 s–1), and the high b-value ADC ranged from 0.72–1.88 x10–3 mm2 s–1 (mean, 1.20 x10–3 mm2 s–1). The high b-value ADC was significantly different between the progressive and stable groups at 3 months' and 6 months' follow-up (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). The rate of tumour progression was significantly higher in those with a lower high b-value ADC than in those with a higher b-value ADC (median progression time, 140 days vs 182 days; p = 0.01). In conclusion, a lower high b-value ADC in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer may be predictive of early progression in chemotherapy-treated patients.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.