BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online September 1, 2008
British Journal of Radiology (2008) 81, 950-954
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/72567977

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BEERES, F J P
Right arrow Articles by RHEMREV, S J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BEERES, F J P
Right arrow Articles by RHEMREV, S J
British Journal of Radiology 81 (2008),950-954 ©2008 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

Observer variation in MRI for suspected scaphoid fractures

F J P BEERES, PhD, MD1, M HOGERVORST, MD2, L M KINGMA, PhD, MD3, S LE CESSIE, PhD4, E G COERKAMP, MD3 and S J RHEMREV, MD1

1 Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Haaglanden, The Hague, 2 Department of Surgery, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn, 3 Department of Radiology, Medical Centre Haaglanden, The Hague, 4 Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands

Correspondence: F J P Beeres, Medical Centre Haaglanden, T.a.v. Secretariaat Heelkunde, Postbus 432, 2501 CK The Hague, The Netherlands. E-mail: f.j.p.beeres{at}lumc.nl

The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the observer variation in the detection of pathology on MRI for suspected acute scaphoid fracture. 79 consecutive MR scans were included to calculate the inter-observer variation. All patients were suspected of having a scaphoid fracture but had no fracture on radiographs. 38 randomly chosen MR scans were used to calculate the intra-observer variation. Four observers, with varying levels of expertise, blinded scored three items: (i) scaphoid fracture, (ii) localization of a scaphoid fracture, and (iii) another fracture. The observer variation was analysed using the kappa statistic. The inter-observer variation for a scaphoid fracture showed substantial agreement. For the localization of a scaphoid fracture and another fracture, there was a moderate and substantial agreement, respectively. The intra-observer variation for a scaphoid fracture had an almost perfect agreement. For the localization of a scaphoid fracture and another fracture, there was an almost perfect and substantial agreement, respectively. In conclusion, the observer variation in MRI of suspected scaphoid fractures was low. The influence of expertise with MRI in daily practice should be taken into consideration. Observers with little experience of MRI will identify all scaphoid fractures but are likely to over-diagnose injuries. Based on these results, it is recommended that all scans are reviewed by an experienced radiologist.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.