BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online July 28, 2008
British Journal of Radiology (2008) 81, 902-906
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/56205669

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROY, D
Right arrow Articles by TONGAONKAR, H B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ROY, D
Right arrow Articles by TONGAONKAR, H B
British Journal of Radiology 81 (2008),902-906 ©2008 The British Institute of Radiology

Short communication

Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of recurrent cervical carcinoma

D ROY, MD1, A KULKARNI, MD1, S KULKARNI, DNB, DMRD1, M H THAKUR, MD1, A MAHESHWARI, MD2 and H B TONGAONKAR, MS2

Departments of 1 Radiodiagnosis, Genitourinary and Gynaec Oncology Services and 2 Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai-400012, India

Correspondence: Aniruddha Kulkarni, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai-400012, India. E-mail: aniruddhavk{at}rediffmail.com

The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided core biopsy for recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix in patients with non-diagnostic vaginal cytology and transvaginal punch biopsy.17 patients with clinical and imaging suspicion of recurrent carcinoma of the cervix, and with negative cytology and punch biopsy, were referred for TRUS-guided biopsy of a recurrent mass. Data were collected with respect to demography, previous diagnosis, treatment received, size and location of the recurrent lesion, and biopsy results. Adequate samples were obtained for all patients. TRUS-guided biopsy was technically successful in all of the patients and provided histological diagnosis of recurrence in 16 patients. One of the patients had post-radiation fibrosis. There were no procedure-related complications. In conclusion, TRUS-guided biopsy for recurrent cervical cancer is a feasible, safe and accurate method for establishing a histopathological diagnosis. It should be considered in patients with non-diagnostic vaginal cytology and punch biopsy.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.