BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2008) 81, 897-901
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/27713136

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by THOMAS, S J
Right arrow Articles by TWYMAN, N I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by THOMAS, S J
Right arrow Articles by TWYMAN, N I
British Journal of Radiology 81 (2008),897-901 ©2008 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

Equivalent squares for small field dosimetry

S J THOMAS, PhD, FIPEM D J EATON, MSci, MSc G S J TUDOR, MSc, MIPEM and N I TWYMAN, MSc, MIPEM

Medical Physics Department, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK

Correspondence: S J Thomas, Medical Physics Department, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK. E-mail: simon.thomas{at}addenbrookes.nhs.uk

The use of equivalent squares is of value when determining output and depth dose data for rectangular fields. We have looked at the variation with field shape of head scatter factors (Sc), phantom scatter factors (Sp) and tissue phantom ratios (TPRs) using measurements on a 6 MV linac with a Moduleaf mini-multileaf collimator. Measurements were made for fields with dimensions down to 1 cm. A different approach to calculating equivalent squares needs to be made depending on the quantity of interest. For TPRs, good agreement for rectangular fields can be obtained using the well established E = 2XY/(X+Y) formula where E is the equivalent square field size and X and Y are the field dimensions. For Sc measurements, where a collimator exchange effect is observed, better agreement is obtained using E = (1+A)XY/(AX+Y), where A is an empirically determined constant. For Sp measurements, E = 2XY/(X+Y) only gives agreement with measurements when the minimum field dimension is at least 2.5 cm. For smaller fields, the equivalent square overestimates Sp, with the difference being strongly related to the value of the smaller dimension. We propose an empirical formula, based on the size of the smaller dimension.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.