BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2008) 81, e249-e251
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/59924178

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DRESEN, R C
Right arrow Articles by BEETS-TAN, R G H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DRESEN, R C
Right arrow Articles by BEETS-TAN, R G H
British Journal of Radiology 81 (2008),e249-e251 ©2008 The British Institute of Radiology

Case report

Linitis plastica of the rectum secondary to bladder carcinoma: a report of two cases and its MR features

R C DRESEN, MD 1 G H BEETS, MD, PhD 2 R F A VLIEGEN, MD 1 D H K V CREYTENS, MD 3 and R G H BEETS-TAN, MD, PhD 1

Departments of 1 Radiology, 2 Surgery and 3 Pathology, University Hospital of Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Correspondence: Raphaëla C Dresen, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. E-mail: ellekedresen{at}hotmail.com

Rectal linitis plastica (RLP) is a circumferentially infiltrating intramural anaplastic carcinoma that results in a rigid constricted rectum with thickened walls. A long delay between the onset of symptoms and the diagnosis often occurs because RLP can mimic a lot of diseases and endoscopy and biopsies are often negative, owing to the fact that the mucosa is frequently unaffected in RLP. RLP secondary to bladder cancer is rarely described in the English literature. We present the first report of the MR features of secondary rectal linitis plastica from a bladder carcinoma. Two patients presented with changed bowel habits. All diagnostic tests were inconclusive. In both patients, pelvic T2 weighted MR images revealed a double-layered thickening of the rectal wall with an inner isointense circumferential thickening of the submucosa and outer hypointense circumferential thickening of the muscular rectal wall. Based on MRI, further investigations were performed and secondary RLP was diagnosed. It is important to establish the diagnosis of RLP early because of its bad prognosis. The value of MRI in supporting the diagnosis of RLP should not be underestimated. As endoscopy plus biopsy can often be negative, we suggest that, if pelvic MRI shows a concentric double layered thickening of the rectal wall over a long segment, then the diagnosis of RLP should be considered. This should prompt further investigations either to confirm or rule out the diagnosis of RLP by performing endoscopy with deep rectal wall biopsies.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.