BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online May 28, 2008
British Journal of Radiology (2008) 81, 699-705
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/29507259

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BEDETTI, G
Right arrow Articles by PICANO, E
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BEDETTI, G
Right arrow Articles by PICANO, E
British Journal of Radiology 81 (2008),699-705 ©2008 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

Cumulative patient effective dose in cardiology

G BEDETTI, MD1, N BOTTO, BSc2, M G ANDREASSI, BSc, PhD2, C TRAINO, BSc3, E VANO, BSc4 and E PICANO, MD, PhD2

1 Hospital S Maria della Scaletta, Imola, 2 CNR, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, 3 Fisica Sanitaria Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Santa Chiara, Pisa, Italy, 4 Medical Physics Service, Radiology Department, Medicine School, Compluetense University, Madrid, Spain

Correspondence: Eugenio Picano, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Via Moruzzi, 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy. E-mail: picano{at}ifc.cnr.it

Medical radiation from X-rays and nuclear medicine is the largest non-natural (man-made) source of radiation exposure in Western countries. The aim of this study was to assess the individual cumulative effective dose in patients admitted to our cardiology ward. We collected a cumulative radiological history from a structured questionnaire and access to hospital records in 50 consecutive adult patients (36 males; age, 66.7±10.8 years) admitted to the Institute of Clinical Physiology in Pisa. The cumulative effective dose was assessed as an indicator of stochastic risk of cancer. We derived the effective dose for each individual examination from the Medical Imaging Guidelines of the European Commission (2001). On average, each patient underwent a median of 36 examinations (interquartile range, 23–46). The median cumulative effective dose was 60.6 mSv. Three types of procedures were responsible for ~86% of the total collective effective dose: (i) arteriography and interventional cardiology (12% of examinations, 48% of average dose per patient); (ii) nuclear medicine (5% of examinations, 21% of average dose per patient); and (iii) CT (4% of examinations, 17% of average dose per patient). The median estimated extra risk of cancer was approximately 1 in 200 exposed subjects. In conclusion, the average contemporary cardiological patient is exposed to a significant cumulative effective dose from diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. It is important to log cumulative dose for each patient at the time of each examination. Every effort should be made to justify the indications and to optimize the doses.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.